2019-02-21 09:19:45 -08:00
|
|
|
#define EFL_GFX_HINT_PROTECTED
|
2016-06-08 04:40:50 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
#include "efl_ui_box_private.h"
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
#include "efl_ui_container_layout.h"
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: handle RTL? just invert the horizontal order?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
typedef struct _Item_Calc Item_Calc;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct _Item_Calc
|
|
|
|
{
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
EINA_INLIST;
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
Evas_Object *obj;
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
double weight_factor;
|
|
|
|
Efl_Ui_Container_Item_Hints hints[2]; /* 0 is x-axis, 1 is y-axis */
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
static int
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
_weight_sort_cb(const void *l1, const void *l2)
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Item_Calc *it1, *it2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
it1 = EINA_INLIST_CONTAINER_GET(l1, Item_Calc);
|
|
|
|
it2 = EINA_INLIST_CONTAINER_GET(l2, Item_Calc);
|
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
return it2->weight_factor <= it1->weight_factor ? -1 : 1;
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-17 10:12:23 -07:00
|
|
|
/* this function performs a simplified layout when the box has changed position
|
|
|
|
* but no other changes have occurred, e.g., when a box is being scrolled
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
_efl_ui_box_layout_simple(Efl_Ui_Box *ui_box, Efl_Ui_Box_Data *pd)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Eo *child;
|
|
|
|
Eina_List *l;
|
|
|
|
Eina_Position2D pos = efl_gfx_entity_position_get(ui_box);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EINA_LIST_FOREACH(pd->children, l, child)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Eina_Position2D child_pos = efl_gfx_entity_position_get(child);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
efl_gfx_entity_position_set(child,
|
|
|
|
EINA_POSITION2D(pos.x - pd->last_pos.x + child_pos.x,
|
|
|
|
pos.y - pd->last_pos.y + child_pos.y));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
pd->last_pos = pos;
|
|
|
|
efl_event_callback_call(ui_box, EFL_PACK_EVENT_LAYOUT_UPDATED, NULL);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
void
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
_efl_ui_box_custom_layout(Efl_Ui_Box *ui_box, Efl_Ui_Box_Data *pd)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
Eo *child;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
Eina_List *li;
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
Eina_Inlist *inlist = NULL;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
Item_Calc *items, *item;
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
Efl_Ui_Container_Item_Hints *hints, *hint;
|
2019-05-24 09:30:31 -07:00
|
|
|
Eina_Bool axis = !efl_ui_layout_orientation_is_horizontal(pd->dir, EINA_FALSE);
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
Eina_Bool r_axis = !axis;
|
|
|
|
int want[2] = { 0, 0 };
|
|
|
|
int count, i = 0;
|
|
|
|
double cur_pos, mmin = 0, weight_sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
Efl_Ui_Container_Layout_Calc box_calc[2]; /* 0 is x-axis, 1 is y-axis */
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
count = eina_list_count(pd->children);
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
if (!count)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2019-03-06 17:40:23 -08:00
|
|
|
efl_gfx_hint_size_restricted_min_set(ui_box, EINA_SIZE2D(0, 0));
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-07-17 10:12:23 -07:00
|
|
|
if (!pd->full_recalc)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
_efl_ui_box_layout_simple(ui_box, pd);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
_efl_ui_container_layout_init(ui_box, box_calc);
|
2019-07-17 10:12:23 -07:00
|
|
|
pd->last_pos.x = box_calc[0].pos - box_calc[0].margin[0];
|
|
|
|
pd->last_pos.y = box_calc[1].pos - box_calc[1].margin[0];
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-17 10:08:58 -07:00
|
|
|
/* Item_Calc struct is currently 152 bytes.
|
|
|
|
* this is pretty big to be allocating a huge number of, and we don't want to explode the stack
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
if (count >= 500)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
items = malloc(count * sizeof(*items));
|
|
|
|
EINA_SAFETY_ON_NULL_RETURN(items);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
items = alloca(count * sizeof(*items));
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
#ifdef DEBUG
|
|
|
|
memset(items, 0, count * sizeof(*items));
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// scan all items, get their properties, calculate total weight & min size
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
EINA_LIST_FOREACH(pd->children, li, child)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
item = &items[i++];
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
item->obj = child;
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hints = item->hints;
|
gfx: Add size hint fill (EO)
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
2019-01-15 23:47:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
_efl_ui_container_layout_item_init(item->obj, hints);
|
gfx: Add size hint fill (EO)
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
2019-01-15 23:47:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous || box_calc[0].fill)
|
|
|
|
hints[0].weight = 1;
|
|
|
|
else if (hints[0].weight < 0)
|
|
|
|
hints[0].weight = 0;
|
gfx: Add size hint fill (EO)
Summary:
If widget use both hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max together, there is no way
to set to hint_align. See, elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box' -
"Button with a quite long text." button. you can control button position
using "Box align" slider, but this is not proper implementation. When there are
two widget which have hint_align(HINT_FILL) and hint_max, those positions are
determined by box_align rather than hint_align. it means widget align cannot be
set individually.
To solve this problem, this patch add hint_fill property. in order to avoid
conflict with legacy API named evas_object_size_hint_fill_set(), it only works
for EO widgets(made by efl_add).
Also, EFL_GFX_SIZE_HINT_FILL is removed.
@feature
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, raster, barbieri
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T3912
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7409
2019-01-15 23:47:51 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous || box_calc[1].fill)
|
|
|
|
hints[1].weight = 1;
|
|
|
|
else if (hints[1].weight < 0)
|
|
|
|
hints[1].weight = 0;
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
weight_sum += hints[axis].weight;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (hints[r_axis].space > want[r_axis])
|
|
|
|
want[r_axis] = hints[r_axis].space;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (hints[axis].space > mmin)
|
|
|
|
mmin = hints[axis].space;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
want[axis] += hints[axis].space;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// total space & available space
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous)
|
|
|
|
want[axis] = mmin * count;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (box_calc[r_axis].size < want[r_axis])
|
|
|
|
box_calc[r_axis].size = want[r_axis];
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// padding can not be squeezed (note: could make it an option)
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
box_calc[axis].size -= (box_calc[axis].pad * (count - 1));
|
|
|
|
box_calc[r_axis].pad = 0;
|
|
|
|
cur_pos = box_calc[axis].pos;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
// calculate weight size
|
|
|
|
if (!pd->homogeneous && (box_calc[axis].size > want[axis]) && (weight_sum > 0))
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
int orig_size, calc_size;
|
|
|
|
double orig_weight = weight_sum;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
calc_size = orig_size = box_calc[axis].size;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
double denom;
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hint = &items[i].hints[axis];
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
denom = (hint->weight * orig_size) - (orig_weight * hint->space);
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
if (denom > 0)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
items[i].weight_factor = (hint->weight * orig_size) / denom;
|
|
|
|
inlist = eina_inlist_sorted_insert(inlist, EINA_INLIST_GET(&items[i]),
|
|
|
|
_weight_sort_cb);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
calc_size -= hint->space;
|
|
|
|
weight_sum -= hint->weight;
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
EINA_INLIST_FOREACH(inlist, item)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
double weight_len;
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hint = &item->hints[axis];
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
weight_len = (calc_size * hint->weight) / weight_sum;
|
|
|
|
if (hint->space < weight_len)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hint->space = weight_len;
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
else
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
weight_sum -= hint->weight;
|
|
|
|
calc_size -= hint->space;
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
// calculate item geometry
|
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
int item_size[2], item_pos[2], sw, sh;
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
if (box_calc[axis].size > want[axis])
|
2019-02-13 05:39:20 -08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous)
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
mmin = (double)box_calc[axis].size / count;
|
|
|
|
else if (EINA_DBL_EQ(weight_sum, 0))
|
|
|
|
cur_pos += (box_calc[axis].size - want[axis]) * box_calc[axis].align;
|
2019-02-13 05:39:20 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
{
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hints = items[i].hints;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-02-13 05:39:20 -08:00
|
|
|
if (pd->homogeneous)
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
hints[axis].space = mmin;
|
|
|
|
hints[r_axis].space = box_calc[r_axis].size;
|
|
|
|
sw = hints[0].space - (hints[0].margin[0] + hints[0].margin[1]);
|
|
|
|
sh = hints[1].space - (hints[1].margin[0] + hints[1].margin[1]);
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
item_size[0] = ((hints[0].weight > 0) && hints[0].fill) ? sw : 0;
|
|
|
|
item_size[1] = ((hints[1].weight > 0) && hints[1].fill) ? sh : 0;
|
2017-08-16 17:53:30 -07:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
_efl_ui_container_layout_min_max_calc(hints, &item_size[0], &item_size[1],
|
|
|
|
(hints[0].aspect > 0) && (hints[1].aspect > 0));
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
item_pos[axis] = cur_pos + 0.5;
|
|
|
|
item_pos[r_axis] = box_calc[r_axis].pos;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
item_pos[0] += (hints[0].margin[0] +
|
|
|
|
((sw - item_size[0]) * hints[0].align));
|
|
|
|
item_pos[1] += (hints[1].margin[0] +
|
|
|
|
((sh - item_size[1]) * hints[1].align));
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
cur_pos += hints[axis].space + box_calc[axis].pad;
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
efl_gfx_entity_geometry_set(items[i].obj,
|
|
|
|
EINA_RECT(item_pos[0], item_pos[1],
|
|
|
|
item_size[0], item_size[1]));
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|
ui.box: refactor layout_update
Summary:
Current layout_update doesn't consider max hint priority. for example, if it
has hint_max, the size is hint_max value regardless of weight or fill.
moreover, if it has hint_aspect with hint_max, hint_min can be ignored.
(test that aspect(1,3) max(50,150), min(70, 70) then, size has (50, 150))
It seems that hint_max is considered as high priority. however, if hint_min
greater than hint_max, hint_max is ignored.
In order to resolve the hint priority conflict, this refactoring supports
following hint priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Specific unit test is D7463
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7750
2019-02-13 05:38:58 -08:00
|
|
|
}
|
efl_ui_table: refactor layout_update
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
2019-02-27 11:45:27 -08:00
|
|
|
want[0] += (box_calc[0].margin[0] + box_calc[0].margin[1]) +
|
|
|
|
(box_calc[0].pad * (count - 1));
|
|
|
|
want[1] += (box_calc[1].margin[0] + box_calc[1].margin[1]) +
|
|
|
|
(box_calc[1].pad * (count - 1));
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
|
2019-07-17 10:12:23 -07:00
|
|
|
pd->full_recalc = EINA_FALSE;
|
2019-03-06 17:40:23 -08:00
|
|
|
efl_gfx_hint_size_restricted_min_set(ui_box, EINA_SIZE2D(want[0], want[1]));
|
2019-04-12 03:18:04 -07:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
efl_event_callback_call(ui_box, EFL_PACK_EVENT_LAYOUT_UPDATED, NULL);
|
2019-07-17 10:08:58 -07:00
|
|
|
if (count >= 500) free(items);
|
2016-04-11 22:10:05 -07:00
|
|
|
}
|