Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Carsten Haitzler a57c7f7510 Revert command line array object because it's broken by design
Revert "ecore: get rid of commands in efl_task."
  This reverts commit 616381e9cf.
Revert "ecore: here comes a command line object"
  This reverts commit 48e5684b3c.

1. this is broken:

EOLIAN static const char*
_efl_core_command_line_command_get(const Eo *obj EINA_UNUSED, Efl_Core_Command_Line_Data *pd)
{
   return eina_strdup(pd->string_command);
}

it returns a const char * BUT it duplicates it on return. no. a big
fat honking NO. return a char * or don't duplicate. pick.

2. _efl_core_command_line_command_array_set() is broken by design. it
accepts an array of strings, but the strings are owned by the caller
who creates the array (requiring they free them up themselves after
this call) but the array becomes owned by the callee. the code here frees the
incoming array but doesn't care about the string content of it. it's
leak heaven waiting to happen (or bugs when someone wants to access
the array they create to walk it to free the strings they put into it
after it is set).

i brought this up and it was dismissed. now exactly he issue i brought
up is there with mixed ownership and the added complexity as well as
transfer of some ownership but not others.

go back and think about this so it isn't broken by design.
2019-02-12 19:54:35 +00:00
Marcel Hollerbach 616381e9cf ecore: get rid of commands in efl_task.
Note that the usage in efl_thread.c should and could be removed.
the problem with its usage is that when the ARGUMENTS event is fired,
noone ever had the chance to subscribe to the loop of the thread yet. So
all in all this is unneccessary, since noone could ever touch that.

Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7517
2019-02-12 11:19:28 +01:00
Marcel Hollerbach 6a7c273ec7 csharp: add a interface to start apps
Summary:
until to today you had to call init functions and a run function which
were static function in a class called Efl.Ui.Config.

However, calling those init functions there is not really OOP style.
Right now things have changed into a manner where you are defining you
application class with inheriting from the Application /
SimpleApplication abstract.

This enables you to call launch() on your application class, calling
launch there leads to a call to the args function, you can call and use
the Efl classes in there, everything is booted up.
Option parsing and dependency start can still be done in the main method
or application constructor, just ensure that you never call any efl
class / function outside the launch function.

A commit that demonstrates the usage can be found at

ref T7204

https://git.enlightenment.org/tools/examples.git/log/?h=devs/bu5hm4n/POC

Reviewers: felipealmeida, segfaultxavi, Jaehyun_Cho, cedric

Reviewed By: segfaultxavi

Subscribers: zmike, woohyun, akanad, lauromoura, #reviewers, #committers

Tags: #efl_language_bindings

Maniphest Tasks: T7204

Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7495
2019-01-16 12:49:47 +01:00