First, fixing ellipsis text positions: ellipsis items should be assigned the
text positions of the omitted text (while maintaining the formatting of the
last visual item). In the case where an entire item was rejected, it
will be assigned that item's text position. If an item was split, it will be
assigned the text position of the split portion.
The BiDi reorder code relies on properly-assigned text positions.
Second, fixing ellipsis handling: the width calc was only considering the
ellipsis item's width. However, if the ellipsis is placed as e.g. the first
visual item (such as in RTL cases), its advance value should've be considered,
instead.
Thanks Youngbok Shin for the test case and information.
@fix
The trivial case of [pos,pos] (i.e. range of length 0) didn't work if there is a
format item in 'pos'.
The condition was fixed to not include such items. The reason it was not
apparent for text items is that these have further handling in the rest of the
code and would've been disposed of.
@fix
Summary:
Font size is scaled according to scale factor.
The linesize, linegap formats also have to be scaled properly.
@fix
Test Plan:
Test cases are included.
Run "make check"
Reviewers: woohyun, Jieun, tasn, herdsman
Reviewed By: tasn
Subscribers: raster, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3688
This was discussed and still wasn't decided whether this is required to be
supported internally.
The reason for this revert is that the behavior still needs tweaking to work
just right along with the legacy behavior.
The implementation depends on creating different code paths from the now-legacy
behavior of text appending.
The annotation system introduced in this commit replaces the current way of
applying formats on text.
Up until now it has been quite a hassle for the user to control the formats, as
it required keeping track of the format positions with an opener and closer
formats almost every time (with the exception of own-closing formats).
The combination of Efl.Text API along with the Efl.Canvas.Text annotation API
essentially replaces the capabilities of the old format.
There is additional annotation API to allow more control, so be sure to check
the documentation/.eo files and the wiki page of Efl.Canvas.Text.
The style API now accepts actual strings of format style. There is not longer
need to instantiate as style with style_new() followed later by style_free().
@feature
We set it but never going to use it afterwards. We already tests the
efl_gfx_buffer_colorspace_get() elsewhere in this tests so we can ignore it
for now until we need it and bring it back together with a user.
This reverts commit 546ff7bbba.
It seems that eo_del() is useful and removing it was creating bugs.
The issue is that the way we defined parents in eo, both the parent and
the programmer share a reference to the object. When we eo_unref() that
reference as the programmer, eo has no way to know it's this specific
reference we are freeing, and not a general one, so in some
circumstances, for example:
eo_ref(child);
eo_unref(child); // trying to delete here
eo_unref(container); // container is deleted here
eo_unref(child); // child already has 0 refs before this point.
We would have an issue with references and objects being freed too soon
and in general, issue with the references.
Having eo_del() solves that, because this one explicitly unparents if
there is a parent, meaning the reference ownership is explicitly taken
by the programmer.
eo_del() is essentially a convenience function around "check if has
parent, and if so unparent, otherwise, unref". Which should be used when
you want to delete an object although it has a parent, and is equivalent
to eo_unref() when it doesn't have one.
We used to have eo_del() as the mirrored action to eo_add(). No longer,
now you just always eo_unref() to delete an object. This change makes it
so the reference of the parent is shared with the reference the
programmer has. So eo_parent_set(obj, NULL) can free an object, and so
does eo_unref() (even if there is a parent).
This means Eo no longer complains if you have a parent during deletion.
Summary:
evas_common_language_from_locale_* functions kept static pointers
inside of its functions. Once these function was called, it was never reset.
It made big problems for harfbuzz and hyphenation. Also, Elementary
provides elm_language_set() API. Then we need to support it fully.
@fix
Test Plan: Test case for hyphenation is included in Evas test suite.
Reviewers: raster, tasn, herdsman, woohyun, z-wony, Blackmole, minudf
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3864
This:
1. opens a file
2. maps its data and vaguely verifies it
3. writes data to it
4. writes data to it with a GRY8 map
5. verifies that the final image has all the proper pixels
An otherwise good looking macro triggers a warning with clang,
because of self comparison of constants (always true or always
false). Let's just silence the warning in this specific spot
with a pragma.
Summary:
add null check in _style_match_tag()
if evas_object_textblock_text_markup_set() is called with markup text before setting style,
segmentation fault is occurred in _style_match_tag()
@fix
Test Plan:
Insert this situation to test suite
-> test id : evas_textblock_simple
Test for without this patch:
1. apply patch just "src/tests/evas/evas_test_textblock.c" partially.
2. $make check
Test for with this patch:
1. apply this patch completely (2 files)
2. $make check
Reviewers: id213sin, herdsman
Subscribers: Blackmole, cedric, jpeg
Projects: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3818
Width calculations should consider the x_bear. This has been leading to
inconsistent results between wrapping calculation during layout and the
final formatted size.
Also, we should stop our walk only when exceeding 'x', so changed "<="
to "<".
@fix
I just ran my script (email to follow) to migrate all of the EFL
automatically. This commit is *only* the automatic conversion, so it can
be easily reverted and re-run.
The tests were assuming that textblock returns a sanitised utf8 string.
This is not always correct, because textblock may cache and return the
set utf8 markup if the text hasn't changed since the last set.
Summary:
When only ellipsis is changed from 0.0~1.0 to -1.0 without resize,
the text is never updated. Because, previous state for ellipsis is never kept
and used properly to check when Evas Text needs to be updated.
It does not have any effect when ellipsis is changed from -1.0 to 0.0~1.0.
Because, Evas text always resize itself according to its text size.
So, necessarily, Evas text object has to be resized to the smaller size.
Commonly, Edje will handle its size if Evas text needs to be ellipsized.
@fix
Test Plan: Test case is included.
Reviewers: tasn, woohyun, herdsman
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3448
Summary:
it->h is sum of max ascent and max descent. It shouldn't be used
when handle ellipsis. Because, Evas Textblock uses these values for
each lines differently according to its location.
(start, end, else, single)
So, for handling ellipsis exactly, it has to be fixed.
Test Plan: A test case is included in Evas Test suite.
Reviewers: woohyun, tasn, herdsman
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3475
Fix some errors, check that file_set and file_save actually work
(rather than have them both fail and pass the test since 0 == 0),
fix temp paths and cleanup unused file.
Summary:
Move common part to a separated document.
Make code more readable using smaller functions. (from Task T2713)
Everything is OK with make check.
Reviewers: cedric, raster, Hermet, stefan_schmidt
Reviewed By: stefan_schmidt
Subscribers: jpeg, artem.popov
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3430
Summary:
Use width of item format to position cursor.
Sometimes it becomes very difficult to
position cursor over item and selection
becomes very difficult as we position the
cursor once the input X coord reached end of the item,
like one attached in the test plan. So this patch
decides over 50% of item width for X coord reaches
to position it at start or end.
@ix
Test Plan:
Attached setup shows how difficult to position cursor at the end when clicked
over item and selection is also very difficult. Consider such case in mobile
device, its becomes impossible to position cursor at the end and selection is
too much difficult.
{F27036}
Also added test cases in evas test suite
Reviewers: herdsman, tasn
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3390
Jean-Philippe Andre
Daniel Hirt
Tom Hacohen
Daniel Hirt
Youngbok Shin
Cedric BAIL
Stefan Schmidt
Jiwon Kim
Vincent Torri
Jean-Philippe ANDRE
perepelits.m
Subodh Kumar