Summary:
timer has no loop pointer until it is finalized
@fix
Depends on D8918
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8947
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8126
Summary:
it is not correct to throw an error when methods are called during
construction
Reviewers: Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: Hermet, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6787
Summary:
Timers are not called in the order they were registered.
Because when current timer is deleted, getting next timer is called twice.
Test Plan:
<error>
Timer1 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer3 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer5 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer7 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer2 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer6 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer4 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer8 expired after 0.001 seconds.
<correct>
Timer1 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer2 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer3 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer4 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer5 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer6 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer7 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer8 expired after 0.001 seconds.|
{F3268233}
Reviewers: Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl_tests
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6700
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
Summary:
This patch checks whether the callback function is valid or not.
Callback function must be set up for the class.
Test Plan: Execute test suite
Reviewers: cedric, raster, stefan, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5762
also eina_procmis was not threadsafe so cannto use loops in different
threads at all until this was made safe. needed to disable the old
ecore_event using code in for ecore futures and create a new efl loop
message future and handler instead ... but now a quick experiment with
multiple loops in 10 threads plus mainloop have timers at least work.
i need to test more like fd handlers etc etc. but it's a step.
stop using the legacy ecore_loop_time_get() func when it should be
coming from the loop object's loop time. also ecore_time_get should
never fall back on ecore_loop_time_get for similar reasons.
part of making the ecore/efl loop a non-global instance (allow loops
in threads)
we really should have data inside the loop object, so begin moving it
one small thing at a time. this is the basics that will allow multiple
efl loops. make an eo efl object and class for fd handlers that is efl loop
bound make fd handlers really bound to their parent loop and not global as
well as have a nice class/obj. create an message queue per loop and
put legacy ecore events on top of it... and a lot more.
this is not 100% done, but it's a lot of the core and groundwork.
various ecore_timer_add(), ecore_diler_add() etc. need changes.
The following still need doing:
ecore_timer (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idler (internal usage for sure)
ecore_idle_enterer
ecore_idle_exiter
ecore_pollers? (is the new efl loop stuff ok?)
ecore_exe (fork/spawn from any thread and track exe from that thread?)
ecore_signal code
ecore_throttle (should we have a single global too? we have per loop)
ecore_app ? (should every loop be given its own argv/argc?)
Lots of internal ecore code uses/calls these legacy calls and we
should have efl loop replacements and/or use the ones we have
The following will bedifferently designed for loop to loop
control/messaging/ipc:
ecore_thread
ecore_pipe
Summary:
The Encoding key is no longer required, all desktop files are assumed to
be UTF-8 encoded. See details at:
https://standards.freedesktop.org/desktop-entry-spec/1.1/apc.html
Fix various typos and misspellings
lintian, Debian's package checker, uses strings to check for common typos
in compiled binaries. This change fixes the ones it identified in 1.20.6.
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5584
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This is particularly useful for ecore_timer_loop_add which are not
supposed to trigger any syscall. It does add a new requirement
on the EFL_LOOP_TIME_CLASS to always have an interval defined during
construction.
It has been discussed on the ML (thread: "[RFC] rename efl_self") and
IRC, and has been decided we should rename it to this in order to avoid
confusion with the already established meaning of self which is very
similar to what we were using it for, but didn't have complete overlap.
Kudos to Marcel Hollerbach for initiating the discussion and
fighting for it until he convinced a significant mass. :)
This commit breaks API, and depending on compiler potentially ABI.
@feature
Efl.Object.event_callback_call no longer calls legacy smart callbacks;
calling only event callbacks registered with the given event description
pointer.
Create the method Efl.Object.event_callback_legacy_call to inherit the old
behavior from Efl.Object.event_callback_call, calling both Efl.Object events
and legacy smart callbacks.
Update all other files accordingly in order to still supply legacy
callbacks while they are necessary.
ecore_timer_del() checks a flag "inside_call" that can be
set before calling the timer cb... but it was never reset
to 0. So, all legacy timers would keep on ticking forever
and ever, until they return CANCEL.
Anyway, I find the distinction between eo_del and
ecore_timer_del very troubling. eo_del() should work
on a legacy timer. Ping @cedric. Maybe override eo_del()?
Fixes T3898
As we add more object in the main loop, they can't live in the top
namespace as they make little sense there (Efl.Fd !). For coherence,
everyone should in the loop namespace, so move timer there.
This reverts commit 546ff7bbba.
It seems that eo_del() is useful and removing it was creating bugs.
The issue is that the way we defined parents in eo, both the parent and
the programmer share a reference to the object. When we eo_unref() that
reference as the programmer, eo has no way to know it's this specific
reference we are freeing, and not a general one, so in some
circumstances, for example:
eo_ref(child);
eo_unref(child); // trying to delete here
eo_unref(container); // container is deleted here
eo_unref(child); // child already has 0 refs before this point.
We would have an issue with references and objects being freed too soon
and in general, issue with the references.
Having eo_del() solves that, because this one explicitly unparents if
there is a parent, meaning the reference ownership is explicitly taken
by the programmer.
eo_del() is essentially a convenience function around "check if has
parent, and if so unparent, otherwise, unref". Which should be used when
you want to delete an object although it has a parent, and is equivalent
to eo_unref() when it doesn't have one.
Previously events used to use class name as a prefix and ignored eo_prefix
when specified. This is no longer the case. Events follow eo_prefix by default
now. In order to get around this for classes where this is undesirable, a new
field event_prefix was added which takes priority over eo_prefix. If neither
is specified, class name is used like previously.
@feature
We used to have eo_del() as the mirrored action to eo_add(). No longer,
now you just always eo_unref() to delete an object. This change makes it
so the reference of the parent is shared with the reference the
programmer has. So eo_parent_set(obj, NULL) can free an object, and so
does eo_unref() (even if there is a parent).
This means Eo no longer complains if you have a parent during deletion.
This reverts commit a13570c17c.
This doesn't really fix the problem which is hidden by eo capability to not
crash on bad unref. With legacy API you are allowed to do a ecore_timer_del
and also return EINA_FALSE. In that case you have a double eo_del (which is
luckily protected) and a double free (that is not). It does crash on the
double free, but the issue is a lifecycle issue. Will bring a better patch
for this.