Summary: Had a chat with raster to understand the behavior of these two functions in the IRC. Thought it might be helpful if added in the documentation itself. So updated it accordingly.
Reviewers: cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D2083
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This affects eo_do() and eo_add() that used to use the ({}) GCCism.
Following a discussion with Peter de Ridder after my talk at FOSDEM,
we've decided to reopen the GCCism (works with other gcc compatible
compilers like clang and intelc) discussion, and after a bit of back and
forth it was decided to make things more portable, at the cost of ease
of use.
For example:
if (eo_do(obj, visible_get()))
is no longer allowed, the portable alternative
Eina_Bool tmp;
if (eo_do_ret(obj, tmp, visible_get()))
is to be used instead.
However:
eo_do(obj, a = a_get(), b = b_get(), bool_set(!bool_get))
are still allowed and OK.
eo_do(obj, if (a_get()) return;);
is no longer allowed, but:
eo_do(obj, if (a_get()) something());
is still allowed.
For clarity, this commit only incorporates the Eo changes, and not the
EFL changes to make the efl conform with this change.
Thanks again to Peter de Ridder for triggering this important discussion
which led to this change.
The header.id was masked before using it as index in the _eo_classes
array and was not unmasked when used.
It hasn't caused segfault (by sheer luck) but was wrong.
@fix
Before this fix, when a deletion was invoked twice on an object, a
wrong message ("...You wrongly call eo_unref() within a destructor...")
was printed. This was caused by the del_triggered flag that was not
resetted when the destruction finished.
This patch fixes this behavior by printing the right message on a double
deletion.
So I don't really understand why the code was not there before, but it resulted
in my experiment of making a combobox for elementary just impossible. Now it
work at least.
In some cases, invalid object ids (e.g 0x1) would pass validation and
represent completely different objects (0x80...01). This happened because
we weren't properly checking a given object id is actually an object id.
@fix.
For some reason, they were normal functions instead of eo functions,
which makes them harder to bind, less safe, and just wrong.
This commit fixes that.
Now it's more clear and consistent. This commit complements the previous
eo_add commit (a7560dbc61).
Now eo_add should be matched with eo_del
eo_ref with eo_unref
eo_add_ref with eo_unref + eo_del
Essentially, the change is that if you have the ref to an object, you
need to unref it. Thus making ref/unref unneeded for most people who use
things (carefully) in c. If however, you would like to delete an object
previously created by you, you should eo_del (counter-part to eo_add).
It's still recommended you ref/unref when dealing with objects in
scopes, as you can't know when an object might just get deleted as a
by-product of another call.
This fixes an issue found by JackDanielZ.
Before this change eo_add() used to create an object with 1 ref, and if
the object had a parent, a second ref.
Now, eo_add() always returns an object with 1 ref, and eo_add_ref()
preserves the old behaviour (for bindings).
eo_unref now un-parents if refcount is 0, and eo_del() is an alias for
eo_unref (will change to be a way to ensure an object is dead and goes
to zombie-land even if still refed).
This moves the mainloop check inside the function. There was never need
for it to be in client code (i.e a header/macro).
This is better suited inside eo_do_start because this is a macro some
bindings have to re-implement, and we definitely don't want it to be any
more complicated than it has to be.
This breaks ABI and makes elm 1.12 depend on efl 1.11. This is not an issue
as because of eolian and interfaces it's already the case.
eina_tls_get is really slow, having a fast path for the main loop does really
help us right now. It is also unlikely that slowing down a little bit the use
of eo in thread is going to have any impact on application speed any time soon.
I win a +10% on expedite benchmark compared to without.
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This enables checking if an object is being created, or has already been
finalized. This is useful in functions that you want to allow
only during the creation phase (i.e inside the eo_add()).
Srivardhan Hebbar
Tom Hacohen
Nicolas Aguirre
Daniel Zaoui
Avi Levin
Jérémy Zurcher
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Daniel Kolesa
Jean Guyomarc'h
Cedric BAIL