Summary:
Change name of 'grid' to 'table' for matching on common ui naming
and avoiding confusion with 'gengrid' and 'grid view'.
grid will be introduced as grid image view after.
Test Plan:
checked make & make install
checked make check - there are errors but not related with these changes.
checked make examples - there are errors in cxx but not related with these changes.
checked make discheck - failed
test in elementary_test with Efl.Ui.Table and Table_static.
Reviewers: raster, cedric, jpeg, felipealmeida
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5668
Summary:
scrollable widgets had a interface_scrollable as a mixin so that the
widgets had a 'is-a' relation with interface_scrollabe. however, new
scroller concept don't have 'is-a' relationship, but 'has-a'
relationship. scrollable widgets should have a scroll manager inside
them, then scroll manager handles event from user and api
implementations. and also we cut the features such as paging because
there will be aka 'elm_pager'.
we are expecting that the new concept make us to maintain the scroller
easier. please excuse for many unorganized code and logics. : (
[contained commit]
scrollable: add efl_ui_scroller example
scrollable: refactoring for behavior in case of multiple scroller
scrollable: remove repetitive scrollbar code.
scrollable: combine calculating bounce distance code.
scroll_manager: mouse up function refactoring
scroll_manager: mouse move function refactoring
scroll_manager: warp animator wip
scroll_manager: fix denominator value when calculating flicking behavior.
Fix to disconnect bounce animator once animation is done
gather duplicated animator drop logics
gather duplicated conditions
Rearrange prototypes and append comment
Add manipulate functions for animators
scroll_manager: change member_add function.
scroll_manger: apply mirroring logic
scroll_manager: apply scrollbar
apply API to scroller widget
scroll_manager: apply scroll event callback
Change logics for all about scroll animating
efl_ui_pan: add efl_ui_pan
scrollable: change content_min_limit to match_content
scroll theme: apply overlapped scrollbar
+ many others!
Reviewers: akanad, woohyun, cedric, jpeg
Subscribers: jenkins, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5222
Note by @jpeg:
Unfortunately this patch comes in a massive single blob, after too many
rebase operations. It has now come to a point where I think the API is
nice and it works as I'd expect.
Now I only wonder how applicable this will be for Efl.Ui.List. As we can
see Photocam (legacy and unified API) could be transformed to use this
new API.
A few classes allow their objects to be duplicated, so they should all
use the same interface.
Also, rename VG's dup to copy_from as it's not conforming to the
definition of dup.
Summary:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T5900
Creating base class(efl_ui_spin) to support various shape of spinner.
Added button interaction widget efl_ui_spin_button inherited from efl_ui_spin.
Test Plan: Add tests in elementary_test.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, woohyun, jpeg, singh.amitesh
Subscribers: jenkins, id213sin, cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5424
When I first implemented the Efl.Container interface I made a mistake of
mixing "single slot" content API's with "multiple children" content
API's. This should fix that, by separating API's that are for a single
part and those that deal with a list of children.
Efl.Content: Single slot. This will be used a lot by efl_part()
objects, and for the default content of widgets (eg. the window
content).
Efl.Container: Multiple children. Used by lists, boxes, layouts
(edje/elm), etc...
I didn't see any class that implemented both interfaces (note: Layout
implements Container and Button implements Content, so technically
Button implements both through inheritance).
For now the eo_prefix is not changed in Efl.Container. I wonder if it
should be reset (to efl_container) or not. This would only affect the C
API.
Ref T5328
This generic format_string would be used in slider,progressbar
and other widgets.This default function handles INT
and DOUBLE eina value types for now.
Ref T6204
Adds basic markup operations for text objects, and implements it in
Efl.Canvas.Text.
Also, this adds the Efl.Text.Markup_Util class.
This utility class allows basic text-markup conversions.
@feature
This introduces, but doesn't make any use of, two types:
- EO interface Efl.Ui.Direction
- Enum Efl.Ui.Dir
This is to clean up inconsistencies with Efl.Orient values when used
with widgets.
Ref T5870
@feature
This introduces the new interface Efl.Ui.Base, intended to
share some APIs between Edje and Elm:
- mirrored (rtl)
- language
- scale
base_scale remains in Edje.Object for now. I don't think it
applies to generic widgets.
The new interface uses eo prefix "efl_ui". It could be renamed
as Efl.Ui (no Base), or anything else. As always, I'm open to
propositions!
Ref T5315
This moves all part_drag APIs to legacy and implements them for
EO using efl_part(). All parts now support these APIs, even if
they are not draggable. Making this more fine grained would
probably be much extra work for little gain.
This creates a new interface Efl.Ui.Drag.
The following text interfaces are added:
- Efl.Text.Font: font settings that decide which font to display in
the text
- Efl.Text.Format: formatting that affects the looks and layout of
the text
- Efl.Text.Style: decorations and overlays that shouldn't affect the
font choice or the layout
@feature
Honestly I can't see why gfx & gfx.path "changed" need a manual
definition, instead of relying on EO. If the API needs to be
internal only, then EO needs to handle internal APIs. In this
case, the event was exposed as a C API but not a EO... why?
Efl.Model.Container and Efl.Model.Item to efl/interfaces are used
to create Efl.Model objects with predefined property values.
This is useful to any situation where we want an Efl.Model with
explicit defined property values.
Efl.Ui.View and Efl.Ui.Factory are used to connect Efl.Models with
Widgets, Elm.Layout and Efl.Ui.Image has changed to use news interfaces
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
efl_ui_menu interface provides common functions of menu, toolbar and ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface provides common functions of menu_item, toolbar_item and ctxpopup_item.
Also implemented some missing functions like selected_item set/get in ctxpopup.
efl_ui_item interface should be used for other widget items as well.
Test Plan: elementary_test
Reviewers: jpeg, felipealmeida, raster, SanghyeonLee, cedric, yashu21985
Subscribers: bu5hm4n
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3897
This removes:
Efl.Event interface
And renames:
Efl.Event.Input -> Efl.Input.Event
Efl.Event -> Efl.Input.Event (merged)
Efl.Event.Pointer -> Efl.Input.Pointer
Efl.Event.Key -> Efl.Input.Key
Efl.Event.Hold -> Efl.Input.Hold
This also moves some interfaces from efl/ to evas/ where they
belong better.
This allows renaming Eo_Event to Efl_Event.
elm_win have three feature releated with screen.
1. screen_rotation_get
2. scrren_size_get
3. screen_dpi_get
so create efl_screen interface, and elm_win implement that interface
This is going back to the same idea as legacy. We will have
events such as:
- move
- down
- up
- in
- out
- wheel
- cancel ("new" - very rare)
Now the question is whether/how we should divide "multi" events
which start from the 2nd finger from standard mouse events. The first
multitouch finger should by default look like a mouse event.
This moves Efl.Pointer.Event back to Evas. Originally I wanted
to share this class with Ecore but eventually I didn't need to
do so, since only ecore_evas (which depends on evas) really needs
access to these.
The internal data struct is not moved out of efl (yet?)
So, this is not a very clean solution, but this mostly
makes Evas_Device an Eo object of class Efl.Input.Device.
Since evas_device relies on some Evas knowledge (evas
callbacks, canvas private data), it can't be fully moved
to lib/efl/.
Making the input device an interface rather than a class
was also not a great solution, as the goal is to share
the data structure around EFL internals (Ecore and Evas).
This should now fix the part API usage once and for all.
EFL should have no part name in any of its APIs beyond
the Efl.Part interface.
Part proxy objects (may be real objects) have a lifetime
of only one function call, in a fashion similar to eo_super.
@feature
Efl - efl_model_base changed to use eina_promise
Eio - eio_model use efl_model_base with promise
Eldbus - elddbus models use promise now
Elementary - elm_view_list and elm_view_form use new models with promise
updated all related examples and tests
This removes Efl.Pack_Named which had a terrible name,
removes Elm.Container which should have been renamed
Efl.Ui.Container anyway, and introduces an interface
Efl.Container instead.
The hierarchy tree is now changed as objects don't inherit
from Efl.Container (it's an interface, not a regular class)
but only implement it. Obviously it is very easy to
reintroduce an Efl.Ui.Container parent class if we need it,
but I guess it should have some actual logic. It's basically
part of what Elm.Widget already does.
Some function names have been modified to look better in C
with the efl_content prefix.
@feature
- Children are now contents
- Efl.Pack_Layout is now a separate class and
merges Pack_Engine.
- Removed dumb class Efl.Pack_Item
- Updated docs
- Added pack_ or grid_ prefixes to some methods
So, since we don't have function pointers, all the solutions
to reimplementing the layout function are quite convoluted:
1. use events
2. reimplement layout func
3. use an extra object
4. use a generic class (non instanciated)
Promises don't apply here (layout will run multiple times).
Problems:
1. Multiple event callbacks will be called, resulting in
potential performance impact, extra events, etc...
Also, there is no way to define standard implementations
that would be provided by the framework.
2. Reimplementation of a function requires extra EO work
(create an EO class, etc...), doesn't allow on-the-fly
change of the layout method.
3. Probably the best solution is to have an object implementing
the layout. But this means creating an extra object along
with the container.
4. To avoid the extra object, use a class, and reimplement
a @class function. This unfortunately requires extra
EO work.
Solution 4. has been selected, but it's not very nice...
I chose the name "pack" instead of containers because it
is shorter, and allows out-of-the-box short C names like
efl_pack_end() instead of efl_container_pack_end().
All Pack interfaces will use the same efl_pack eo prefix.
This is still work in progress.
@feature
Efl.Flip is now the enum, the interface is Flipable.
We could even use names like Efl.IFlip a la Java.
eo_prefix is used to have pretty names in C. legacy: null
is removed from the enums. orient_x0 is removed and only
defined in C with #define
Summary:
Implement common interface efl_ui_progress and inherit slider and progressbar from common interface.
Currently legacy APIs will also call interface functions and later it can be deprecated.
This interface will be moved to EFL in src/lib/efl/interfaces when elementary is merged into efl.
Test Plan:
elementary_test -to 'slider'
elementary_test -to 'progressbar'
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, raster, tasn, felipealmeida, woohyun, cedric, jpeg
Subscribers: saurabhbunty, alok25
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3759
This fixes a crash in ecore_init, calling a weak function from
libefl that was resolved to NULL.
So, here's a fun thing happening with GCC < 5.3. Since a1a506e13e
all EOAPI and EO class_get() functions are weak symbols. This means
that all APIs inside libefl.so are weak.
As a result, gcc linker with --as-needed skipped linking to libefl
since not a single strong symbol from libefl was required by
libecore. This is actually a bug in gcc linker since we do in fact
use symbols from libefl, just weak ones.
GCC 5.3 seems to be fixed, so people with GCC 5.3+ will not
experience any build/runtime issue. The current patch is
a workaround that bug, by artifically creating a strong symbol
required by ecore.
Other libraries than ecore might also need to call
__efl_internal_init, if they end up not being linked to libefl.
Summary:
Added flip and orientation interface and used them in evas_image.
Removed efl_image_orientation_set API and used efl_orientation_set and efl_flip_set API.
In implementation part, converted enums back and forth in order to keep current implementation as it is.
Test Plan: src/examples/evas/evas-images5.c
Reviewers: singh.amitesh, raster, tasn, herdsman, woohyun, cedric, felipealmeida, jpeg
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D3844
this adds a core vpath subsystem to efl that allows paths like:
~/file.jpg
~user/file.jpg
(:tmp/file.jpg
(:config/file.jpg
(:videos/file.mp4
(:pictures/file.jpg
(:app.config/mycfg.cfg
etc. to be translated/looked up. it is desitgned to be async and call
event callbacks when ready. the reason for this complexity is fo in
future also handle:
file:///whatever/file.jpg
http://blah.com/file.jpghttps://blah.com/file.jpg
ssh://blah.com:~/file.jpg
etc.
@feature
This interface groups all low-level animated image functions.
FIXME:
- Rename to Efl.Image.Animated once eolian is fixed
- Fix mess with emile enum (loop_hint)
It has been decided that we would not use any namespace for interface
and they will sit in efl main namespace.
This patch doesn't correct the naming of the event has we don't have a
prefix for event. We do still have EFL_ANIMATOR_EVENT_ANIMATOR_TICK,
instead of a nicer EFL_EVENT_ANIMATOR_TICK.
This hasn't been used for a while. Since we are going to break Eo a bit anyway
it's a good opportunity to drop this.
This may cause a slight performance issues with legacy events, such as
smart callbacks. This shouldn't really be a problem as we've migrated away from
them. If it does, we need to migrate the remaining parts. Only relevant
for callbacks that are added before the classes are created, which
shouldn't be possible except for smart, only for old evas callbacks.
This creates the new interface
Efl.Gfx.Filter
And the implementation is a mixin (evas_filter_mixin.c):
Evas.Filter
All the filter rendering code has now been moved to this
new file. TODO: Merge image filtering.