Before this fix, when a deletion was invoked twice on an object, a
wrong message ("...You wrongly call eo_unref() within a destructor...")
was printed. This was caused by the del_triggered flag that was not
resetted when the destruction finished.
This patch fixes this behavior by printing the right message on a double
deletion.
So I don't really understand why the code was not there before, but it resulted
in my experiment of making a combobox for elementary just impossible. Now it
work at least.
In some cases, invalid object ids (e.g 0x1) would pass validation and
represent completely different objects (0x80...01). This happened because
we weren't properly checking a given object id is actually an object id.
@fix.
For some reason, they were normal functions instead of eo functions,
which makes them harder to bind, less safe, and just wrong.
This commit fixes that.
Now it's more clear and consistent. This commit complements the previous
eo_add commit (a7560dbc61).
Now eo_add should be matched with eo_del
eo_ref with eo_unref
eo_add_ref with eo_unref + eo_del
Essentially, the change is that if you have the ref to an object, you
need to unref it. Thus making ref/unref unneeded for most people who use
things (carefully) in c. If however, you would like to delete an object
previously created by you, you should eo_del (counter-part to eo_add).
It's still recommended you ref/unref when dealing with objects in
scopes, as you can't know when an object might just get deleted as a
by-product of another call.
This fixes an issue found by JackDanielZ.
Before this change eo_add() used to create an object with 1 ref, and if
the object had a parent, a second ref.
Now, eo_add() always returns an object with 1 ref, and eo_add_ref()
preserves the old behaviour (for bindings).
eo_unref now un-parents if refcount is 0, and eo_del() is an alias for
eo_unref (will change to be a way to ensure an object is dead and goes
to zombie-land even if still refed).
This moves the mainloop check inside the function. There was never need
for it to be in client code (i.e a header/macro).
This is better suited inside eo_do_start because this is a macro some
bindings have to re-implement, and we definitely don't want it to be any
more complicated than it has to be.
This breaks ABI and makes elm 1.12 depend on efl 1.11. This is not an issue
as because of eolian and interfaces it's already the case.
eina_tls_get is really slow, having a fast path for the main loop does really
help us right now. It is also unlikely that slowing down a little bit the use
of eo in thread is going to have any impact on application speed any time soon.
I win a +10% on expedite benchmark compared to without.
Signed-off-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
This enables checking if an object is being created, or has already been
finalized. This is useful in functions that you want to allow
only during the creation phase (i.e inside the eo_add()).
Comp objects are rare, and since we allow using classes as interfaces,
we end up allocating a lot of memory for something we don't even use.
That's why it was a linked list in the first place, and that's why it
should remain a list.
This is almost a complete revert. I reverted the code itself, and the
intent (use of array instead of list), but not the tests, or the new
return value added to comp_detach, which is useful.
This reverts commit ef09ef7489.
Daniel Zaoui
Jérémy Zurcher
Tom Hacohen
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Daniel Kolesa
Jean Guyomarc'h
Cedric BAIL
Jean-Philippe Andre