first use consistent ownership (stringshare the strings) and then also
properly dup and pass them and not free null arrays and so on where
they are used
strings often enough are generated e.g. via "%s/%s" or "%i" or similar
etc. ... i have poitned to examples, so move to make all strings
consistently stringshared, fix a bug added to the efl thread code
where it accessed and freed array even tho array was consumed (but not
strings) in the set, and the code used free to consume not
stringshare_del. fix other code and tests to match
EXCTLY the kind of bugs and mistakes with this kind of design that i
said would happen more often just happened...
so this chnage totally threww away all the thread safety and locking
without doing the simple thing of using a shared obcj for the global
env obj to ensure brute force safety at least. fix.
Summary:
Including these headers does no longer mean that you want to use BETA API.
More and more methods in these libs will come out of BETA and they will
be usable without requiring EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT to be defined by the app.
This concludes this patchset. Now apps can chose to define EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT
or not, and they will have access to the requested API subset, but both options
are available.
Depends on D7951
Fixes T7692
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7952
Summary:
Instead of surrounding all the #include "*.eo.h" lines in Efl.h
with #ifdef EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT, include these files unconditionally, but mark
all classes as @beta in the eo files.
This will allow taking them out of beta one by one as we deem them stable enough.
Otherwise, the current procedure involves moving the #include line out of the
ifdef block, which is cumbersome and messes include order.
Depends on D7950
Fixes T7692
Test Plan: Nothing changes
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7692
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7951
This allows an fd handler to be called after select exits unconditionally.
Our wayland client code needs this to be thread safe, as it needs to
call prepare_read before entering select, and then either read or
cancel_read after select.
Signed-off-by: Derek Foreman <derek.foreman.samsung@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Michael <cp.michael@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7914
Until this commit eo did class functions as part of the vtable, which
enabled those functions to be overwritten in classes inheriting another
class. However in task T7675 we decided that this is not really good for
bindings, as most OOP languages do not support this sort of feature.
After this commit eolian realizes class function completly outside of
the vtable, the c-symbol that is the class funciton is now just directly
redirecting to a implementation, without the involvement of the vtable.
This also means a change to the syntax created by eo:
Calling before:
class_function(CLASS_A);
Calling after:
class_function();
Implementation before:
class_function(const Eo *obj, void *pd) { ... }
Implementation after:
class_function(void) { ... }
This fixes T7675.
Co-authored-by: lauromauro <lauromoura@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7901
Summary:
This allows an fd handler to be called after select exits unconditionally.
Our wayland client code needs this to be thread safe, as it needs to
call prepare_read before entering select, and then either read or
cancel_read after select.
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7914
This reverts commit a57c7f7510.
I pretty much hate to just revert your revert, but you failed to read my
replies, and failed to understand what i was talking about.
And YES we talked at fosdem about the platform issue, and do you
remember my answer, that back in time this might be the case, today is
different freebsd suppoerts setenv, and for windows we have a setenv
implementation in evil. And yes, vtorri also created a issue how bad and
evil this commit is, however, i still fail to see the issue since setenv
unsetenv and clearenv usages are taken as needed. (T7693)
The ownership question is answered in
https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7516#137367.
Can we please get into a state of technical discussions, and not *oh
shit, i am going to revert this* this has been in review for a long
time, a lots of people have tested it, we discussed things on it, and
there was 3 weeks of no reply from you.
The issues that exist will be dealed with. Feel free to create tasks if
you want :)
setenv and unsetenv are not portable. i explained to you at fosdem
there are issues and it's why i used putenv in the original
implementation and even though it's a pain (the string tou pass to
putenv is a pointer used literallt from there on in and you get it
from getenv, thus making ownership a pain -this is a libc issue we
can't readily solve). use putenv like the original code. then put it
back in. vtorri now has windows porting issues with the setenv use. i
knew there was a reason that still existed...
in addition your in_sync stuff is broken. psuedocode:
// assuming BLAGH env is not set to anything here
c = efl_core_env_get(global_env, "BLAH");
...
putenv("BLAH=10");
...
c = efl_core_env_Get(global_env, "BLAH");
i will get NULL in both cases for c ... but i should get "10" for the
2nd in reality. reality is lots of code across application code and
libraries will at times mess with the environment. it has to work with
this. the prior implementation did work with this.
Revert "ecore: here comes a env object"
This reverts commit 2373d5db5b.
Revert "efl_task: remove env from this object"
This reverts commit c3d69f66a6.
Revert "ecore: get rid of commands in efl_task."
This reverts commit 616381e9cf.
Revert "ecore: here comes a command line object"
This reverts commit 48e5684b3c.
1. this is broken:
EOLIAN static const char*
_efl_core_command_line_command_get(const Eo *obj EINA_UNUSED, Efl_Core_Command_Line_Data *pd)
{
return eina_strdup(pd->string_command);
}
it returns a const char * BUT it duplicates it on return. no. a big
fat honking NO. return a char * or don't duplicate. pick.
2. _efl_core_command_line_command_array_set() is broken by design. it
accepts an array of strings, but the strings are owned by the caller
who creates the array (requiring they free them up themselves after
this call) but the array becomes owned by the callee. the code here frees the
incoming array but doesn't care about the string content of it. it's
leak heaven waiting to happen (or bugs when someone wants to access
the array they create to walk it to free the strings they put into it
after it is set).
i brought this up and it was dismissed. now exactly he issue i brought
up is there with mixed ownership and the added complexity as well as
transfer of some ownership but not others.
go back and think about this so it isn't broken by design.
Note that the usage in efl_thread.c should and could be removed.
the problem with its usage is that when the ARGUMENTS event is fired,
noone ever had the chance to subscribe to the loop of the thread yet. So
all in all this is unneccessary, since noone could ever touch that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7517
the mixin for now can carry a command, which can be setted as an string.
The string is then parsed again, this is done in order to make sure that
everything that needs escaping really is escaped or parsed correctly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7516
the env object can be used to alter and edit the content of environment
variables. Additionally, the class efl.core.env can be used to to setup
a not applied set of environment variables, which then can be applied
later (in the future) to set it directly to a spawned process for
example, or as a general key/data storage. A efl.core.env object can
also be forked off, which makes it easy to customize predefined objects.
ref T7514
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7510
Summary:
These constructors aren't checked for in the finalize step of the
initialization and may be given the @optional tag.
For C# this means they can be ommitted from the constructor call.
This also adds `Efl.Ui.View.model` as a constructor of
`Efl.Composite_Model` as the finalizer checks for it.
Fixes T7673
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Maniphest Tasks: T7673
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7855
Summary:
As the result of discussion in T7458,
we need to rename all efl_model based classes with efl_XXX_Model sequence.
I've run few vote for this, see V42, V43
few classes are totally renamed as our consideration of misnaming.
| Efl.Model_Loop | Efl.Loop_Model |
| Efl.Model_Item | Efl.Generic_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container | Efl.Container_Model |
| Efl.Model_Container_Item | Efl.Container_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite | Efl.Composite_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean | Efl.Boolean_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean_Chlidren | Efl.Boolean_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection | Efl.Select_Model |
| Efl.Model_Composite_Selection_Chlidren | Efl.Select_Model_Item |
| Efl.Model_View | Efl.View_Model |
| Eio.Model | Efl.Io.Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_State | Efl.Ui.State_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Size | Efl.Ui.Size_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Exact | Efl.Ui.Exact_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Average | Efl.Ui.Average_Model |
| Efl.Ui.Model_Homogeneous | Efl.Ui.Homogeneous_Model |
I worried about Efl.Io.Model changes, cause it is widely used,
but as I tested, there is no issue found yet.
Eldbus.Model also may can changed Efl.Dbus.Model,
but I cannot found any class who using Efl.Dbus namespace,
so I left it future work.
Test Plan:
Run the Make Test,
it works well except Efl test about selection.
there are class inheritance problem exist in select_model,
I reported it and will fix it in another patch.
Reviewers: cedric, felipealmeida, woohyun, Hermet
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: lauromoura
Tags: #efl, #do_not_merge
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7533
This will enable inheriting class to not have to implement as much code. This patch
fix also all class that use Efl.Model_Composite and its test.
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7654
Summary:
there is no user, additionally, there is undefined API on this object,
thus make it abstract. This resolves the missing APIs of efl_model_loop.
ref T5719
Depends on D7790
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5719
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7791
Summary:
If you don't set the interval during construction, construction fails
so there's no chance to set it later.
We either change that behavior (is it really needed? can't we just set some
default during construction and override it later?) or properly mark this
property as a construction-time property with this patch.
Test Plan: Nothing changes, this will only have effect once bindings start using it.
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, bu5hm4n, q66
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7691
Summary:
It is a mixin only because of the setter method for the "closed" property,
otherwise, it would be a pure interface.
Nobody is setting that property, so let's just remove the setter (leaving only
the getter) and make this class an interface.
This should clear the scenario for languages currently having issues with
mixins (like C#).
Related to T7601.
Test Plan: Nothing changes. Make check and examples still work.
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7570
this event is called on the app object when all windows have been destroyed
so that the app can decide to take further action, e.g., doing a deep clean of
cache or flushing configuration
@feature
ref T5494
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7593
If you need data, use a efl_future_then as done in every case here to get the same feature.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7577
This serie of patch didn't address the core problem in the design of the
ownership of eina_promise_data_{set/get} usage. It is also redundant with
other infrastructure in eina_promise and so not necessary completely.
This reverts commit de2ec0559b.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7573
There is no point in having the object instancable. However, in order to
support bindings, we need to ensure that every abstract does have only
abstracts as inherit-parents, thus making this class abstract.
ref T7240
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7599
Summary:
this makes efl_task abstract which ensures that it cannot be
instanciated. Further more, functions that needs to be implement are now
pure_virtual.
ref T7514
Reviewers: zmike, segfaultxavi, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7514
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7508
Summary: this patch modify ecore_thread_wait documentation to use it only main llop explicitly.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7225
they are so slowly caught by two reasons:
- .eo.c files are defining weak symbols, so no warnings when a symbol is
missing
- The APIs of the missing files are not tested, nor in examples in tree,
so not build and not discovered
This allow for simplifying the code that doesn't need to handle get/set/free
callback when not needed.
Reviewed-by: SangHyeon Jade Lee <sh10233.lee@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7489
With the advancement of our MVVM interfaces, we realize that it could be made easier,
especially for bindings, to write an Efl.Model that proxy another one without having to
necessarily implement the entire logic of propagating event and checking if the property
we are getting request for is actually handle by our own Efl.Model. To simplify this,
I introduce this class that allow to set new callback for each property you want to handle
on your object.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7487
In case the model being set has already gotten some event callback
set on it, to avoid strange behavior, like event not propagating,
it seems best to make sure the event are forwarded first.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7483
After the loop_promise_new changes. Also fix unused var warning.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7531
commit 9b5155c9f1 brought about crashes
- specifically that i saw in terminology because it actually uses
eina_promise_data_set() and the new efl_loop_promise_new basically
took over ownership of that data, but if anyone used
eina_promise_data_set() the data ptr used by this new code would bwe
overwritten, causing segfauls when terminology loses selection
ownership. for days i had mysterious crashes of terminology until i
narrowed it down to the above, so if you have too, then this will fix
it.
what this does is create a data set intercept function callback that
for now is only for use inside efl to everride data sets so they set
data inside the new struct that tracks data. i also had to add and
intercept for eina_promise_data_free_cb_set() as this in theory could
also ber a similar problem.
so perhaps the idea/design of efl_loop_promise_new() is not right and
this kind of thgn has to be internal to eina promise... this means
eina promise and loops are much more tied together.
there are the 3 files in ecore. However, they have not been tested,
there are additionally no examples at all, which did not bring up the
missing API calls, now they are here.
Note: they are compiling, however, it seems that it is not working right
now.
This reverts commit 9b5155c9f1.
For now lets revert this, this breaks copy and paste, further more it
has the potential to break a lot more things, as eio_model tends to use
efl_loop_promise new, and then eina_promise_data_set, which is
explicitly forbidden.
This fixes crashing terminology instances.
I am not sure this is the right way to do it as binding would have to likely
to bind it manually.
Reviewed-by: Lauro Neto <Lauro Moura <lauromoura@expertisesolutions.com.br>>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7492
This build was never complete and also was not maintained probebly.
It is also dropped in favour of meson which is cool, merged, works & is fast.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7010
This brings in the possibility to receive the app object from bindings.
With the app object you can listen to pause / args / terminate / resume
events.
fix T7509
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7480
Summary:
In the case when you have multiple future in flight related to one object, you
couldn't use the previous version of efl_future_then. Now all function calls
take a void* pointer that allow multiple future to have their private data
request data accessible in all the callback.
This should not break released API as Eo.h is not released yet and so
was efl_future_Eina_FutureXXX_then.
Depends on D7332
Reviewers: felipealmeida, segfaultxavi, vitor.sousa, SanghyeonLee, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7472
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7379
The new helper help replace call to eina_future_resolved and eina_future_rejected with
a scheduler lookup to just one function call.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7341
This make all object that inherit from Efl.Loop_Consumer have an easy ability to create a future
from their link to a loop provider. This way there is no need to further lookup for a scheduler.
This can by applied after the patch series from T7471.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7337
Fix bugs on Views and Model related with null items and proper ownership and
life-cycle of components.
Configure default theme for default factory on finalize.
Fix type error while getting boolean property from Efl.Model_Composite_Boolean.
Fix properties_get methods for all composite models.
Now properly call property.changed events when it is needed.
Use EINA_VALUE_TYPE_BOOL instead of EINA_VALUE_TYPE_UCHAR.
Remove some memory leaks.
Summary:
- Replace '\@ref name' with '@name'
- Remove unused \@internal tag
This tag affects text AFTER it, and there is no text after it.
- Remove \@note tag
Replaced with a simple NOTE: text, since eolian does not have an equivalent tag.
- Remove spurious \@Efl... tags
They should really be @Efl...
- Remove \@p tags
There is no eolian equivalent, and a simpler $ suffices in this case.
Fixes T7482
Reviewers: q66
Reviewed By: q66
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7482
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7372
This new syntax separates the parent class from extensions, in
a familiar way to similar to e.g. Java. Since changing everything
at once is a lot of effort, implement it alongside for the time
being.
Since Efl.Interpolator's subclasses are used as interpolator class,
Efl.Interpolator class is changed to be an interface.
This change allows Efl.Canvas.Animation to have Efl.Interpolator as its
property in efl_canvas_animation.eo.
Summary:
This commit removes some clashes (i.e. names as classes and namespaces
at the same time). It'll avoid nested items that are either forbidden
(C#) or problematic (Python) in some languages.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7260
This uses the meson/ninja depfile functionality + eolian to make
sure proper dependencies between generated files and .eo files
are managed, to ensure consistent re-generation of all generated
files that are affected upon .eo file modification.
For custom rules with multiple outputs, Ninja currently does not
support depfiles. Therefore, split those into two custom rules
so that the depfiles functionality can be enabled. While this
is ugly and slows down the process a little by having to invoke
Eolian twice instead of once, it has to be done and it's still
better than what we had in Autotools anyway.
Differential revision: D7187
Fixes T6700.
this unifies the system types into 4 boolean flags
This fixes the fact that meson changed the system string accross
versions.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7144
a new shiny buildtool that currently completes in the total of ~ 4 min..
1 min. conf time
2:30 min. build time
Where autotools takes:
1:50 min. conf time
3:40 min. build time.
meson was taken because it went quite good for enlightenment, and is a traction gaining system that is also used by other mayor projects. Additionally, the DSL that is defined my meson makes the configuration of the builds a lot easier to read.
Further informations can be gathered from the README.meson
Right now, bindings & windows support are missing.
It is highly recommented to use meson 0.48 due to optimizations in meson
that reduced the time the meson call would need.
Co-authored-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <zmike@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7012
Depends on D7011
Summary:
We have back-ends that can generate their own tick sources, but
ecore_animator_add()/ecore_animator_timeline_add() gives no indication
which backend the animator is running on. This means that all animators
have to cause all currently in use backends to tick.
For example, if under wayland 4 application windows are open, all 4
windows will create ticks when any animator is present.
These new animator APIs that take an evas object allow us to figure out
out the backend and only cause the appropriate one to tick.
Depends on D7040
Reviewers: devilhorns
Reviewed By: devilhorns
Subscribers: devilhorns, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7041
event handler start at 1 (see _ecore_event_message_handler_type_new and
_ecore_event_message_handler_efl_object_constructor) so that handlers[0] is not
allocated. this patch avoid invalid memory access.
this fixes T7349
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6966
Summary: I had fixed some typos and some wrong expressions in API reference doc
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: raster, zmike, Hermet, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6943
Summary:
it is not correct to throw an error when methods are called during
construction
Reviewers: Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: Hermet, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6787
Summary:
Ecore internally uses 10 events, from ECORE_EVENT_SIGNAL_USER=1 to
ECORE_EVENT_SYSTEM_TIMEDATE_CHANGED=10. The Ecore.Event.Message_Handler
singleton that holds the counter of events is initialized with -1.
This is followed in _ecore_event_init() by ten calls to
ecore_event_message_handler_type_new(), which increase the counter of
event by one each.
This results in an event counter to be 9 (-1 + 10) at the end of the
initialization of ecore_events. This means that the next event to be
created will have a value of 10, which will overlap with
ECORE_EVENT_SYSTEM_TIMEDATE_CHANGED. As such, these two distinct events
will be aliased and their associated handlers will be called at
unexpected times, with unexpected data.
By changing the constructor value from -1 to 0, we prevent this event
aliasing.
Fixes T6605
Reviewers: zmike, Hermet
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T6605
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6894
Summary:
This reverts commit 4917910b49.
4917910b break backward compatibility.
Reproduction:
void pipe_handler(...);
pipe = ecore_pipe_add(pipe_handler, NULL);
ecore_pipe_write(pipe, NULL, 0);
Because of the null check condition, pipe_handler isn't called after 4917910b.
Some apps behavior which is written to expected to call pipe_handler was broken.
also, this patch fixed segfault during build on Windows
Test Plan: make on Windows
Reviewers: raster, zmike, vtorri
Reviewed By: zmike, vtorri
Subscribers: woohyun, cedric, #reviewers, #committers, zmike, vtorri
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6824
Summary:
in the case where the user has called loop_time_set with a value in the future,
avoid setting the loop time to something that would potentially cause a callback
to occur with a loop_time value before a previous occurrence of that callback
@fix
Reviewers: ManMower
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: ManMower, #reviewers, cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6764
Summary:
Timers are not called in the order they were registered.
Because when current timer is deleted, getting next timer is called twice.
Test Plan:
<error>
Timer1 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer3 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer5 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer7 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer2 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer6 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer4 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer8 expired after 0.001 seconds.
<correct>
Timer1 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer2 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer3 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer4 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer5 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer6 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer7 expired after 0.001 seconds.
Timer8 expired after 0.001 seconds.|
{F3268233}
Reviewers: Hermet, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, SanghyeonLee
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl_tests
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6700
Summary:
attempt to prevent any access of the signal pipe once signal handlers are
removed in order to avoid triggering a SIGPIPE which would kill the app
Depends on D6670
Reviewers: ManMower
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6672
Summary:
if a signal is already in the signal pipe when close() is called,
this will trigger a SIGPIPE. if the signal handler exists, this will
cause the signal handler to infinitely recurse when trying to print
the error messages from write()ing the signal data to the close()d
pipe
fix T7158
Reviewers: ManMower
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Maniphest Tasks: T7158
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6670
Summary:
windows does not include ecore_signal.c, so this is not a defined symbol
lib/ecore/.libs/lib_ecore_libecore_la-ecore_anim.o: In function `timer_tick_notify':D:\Documents\MSYS2\home\vtorri\gitroot\efl3\src/lib/ecore/ecore_anim.c:372: undefined reference to `exit_signal_received'lib/ecore/.libs/lib_ecore_libecore_la-ecore_anim.o: In function `ecore_animator_custom_tick':D:\Documents\MSYS2\home\vtorri\gitroot\efl3\src/lib/
ecore/ecore_anim.c:940: undefined reference to `exit_signal_received'
ref 6405a5a68c
Reviewers: vtorri, devilhorns
Reviewed By: vtorri
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl_build
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6648
Summary:
Silence compilation warning.
There is an ifdef'd block of code which accesses obj but
I don't think it's in use in production?
Test Plan: Build EFL and watch for warning.
Reviewers: #committers, zmike, Hermet
Reviewed By: #committers, Hermet
Subscribers: cedric
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6628
Summary:
when an exit (SIGINT, SIGQUIT, SIGTERM) signal is received, the ui should
immediately stop updating in order to present the user with an instant
response
this uses a simple volatile int to block any ticks which begin after the
signal is received; if a signal is received during a tick then it will complete
normally
fix T7000
Depends on D6589
Reviewers: ManMower
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl_main_loop
Maniphest Tasks: T7000
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6590
Summary:
When closing the fd handler, it checks if the fd is already closed and prints
an annoying warning: "fd %d closed, can't remove from epoll - reinit!"
We need to close the handler first and then the actual fd.
I am not familiar with this part of the code, but this fix removes the warnings
and does not seems to have adverse effects.
Test Plan: It had warnings before and now it doesn't, haven't observed any other adverse effect.
Reviewers: raster, zmike, devilhorns
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6561
Summary:
We should only ever have a pos of 1.0 once, the current terminal
condition gives the impression that it might be possible to have
more than one 1.0 firing.
This would break a lot of code.
No functional change intended.
Depends on D6464
Reviewers: devilhorns, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6465
this avoids the case where the main loop is waiting on a thread
and that same thread is waiting on the main loop
@fix
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6438
if a thread is actively waiting on the main loop in order to proceed
with its exit, a flush here avoids the case where the thread waits
until the main loop has exited
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6437
since this is now a smaller wait interval, looping more times helps
ensure success for threads which have longer blocking operations
between lifetime checks
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6436
Summary:
now that ecore accurately waits on all threads while exiting, this
loop needs to run much more frequently in order to avoid waiting for
an unreasonably long time when exiting
Reviewers: ManMower, devilhorns
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6427
these threads are still managed by the main loop, meaning they must be
accounted for so that they can be waited on if necessary during shutdown
this resolves some issues where ecore-con threads would persist after the
main thread had exited or called ecore_shutdown
@fix
fix T7041
this is the final version of the patch and not the mangled version which
was previously committed
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6354
these threads are still managed by the main loop, meaning they must be
accounted for so that they can be waited on if necessary during shutdown
this resolves some issues where ecore-con threads would persist after the
main thread had exited or called ecore_shutdown
@fix
fix T7041
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6354
these headers are not available on all platforms (e.g., windows) and so
the corresponding #ifdef checks must be used in order to correctly include
them
ref 1adb73cef8
ref T5725
fix T7063
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6369
Summary:
ensure that this occurs as expected when forks happen
note that this is already being actively tested in the elm unit tests
Depends on D6307
Reviewers: ManMower, devilhorns
Reviewed By: ManMower
Subscribers: cedric, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6308
Glib integration with using of select() syscall doesn't properly
propagates G_IO_ERR condition for network sockets. Problem relies in
_ecore_glib_context_poll_to() where rewriting filedescriptor events to
GPollFD structures reside.
This fixes T5725
@fix
Summary:
Animators shouldn't be used as a general purpose timer mechanism,
we could use a timer, but a poller seems to make more sense as
it limits the impact of the instrumentation on the code it's
instrumenting.
Reviewers: stephenmhouston, zmike
Reviewed By: stephenmhouston, zmike
Subscribers: stephenmhouston, cedric, #committers, zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6251
Summary:
All events must have a type now, otherwise bindings don't know how to handle
the event_info field.
Most of the missing event types were actually "void" (no event_info present).
Some struct definitions had to be moved to eo instead of h files, so they
are available to bindings. Some have not, and are marked with FIXME.
Some namespaces have been fixed (like Efl_Event_Cb -> Efl.Event_Cb).
In general, there are hundreds of changed files, but mostly to add a type which
was not present before, so there's no harm done.
Also, A lot of FIXMEs have been added which should be, like, fixed.
For example, some events can send different types of event_info, which is
very inconvenient (and error prone).
Test Plan: make with c# bindings works, make check and make examples work too.
Reviewers: cedric, q66, lauromoura
Subscribers: zmike
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D6169
Initial results of our static analysis showed a bunch of unused
imports or imports used only for documentation references. In the
first case, remove entirely, in the second case, change to 'parse'
in order to keep references working.
The static analysis is not perfect and yields false negatives for
certain cases, so there will be a second batch later.
The value must be given to eina_value_set and not a pointer to a
Eina_Value.
This bug results in always getting wrong exit code when the application
terminates.
This changes a lot of things all across the EFL. Previously,
methods tagged @const had both their external prototype and
internal impl generated with const on object, while property
getters only had const on the external API. This is now changed
and it all has const everywhere.
Ref T6859.
Summary:
it turns out that 0.01s is actually a lot, accounting for something like
20s across a run of 'make check' while providing no additional value
ref e0c8ab4c79
ref T6825
ref T6864
Reviewers: cedric
Maniphest Tasks: T6864, T6825
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5941
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
this is only meant to listen to data which is currently available,
not wait for new data
@fix
Depends on D5866
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5867
Reviewed-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
Summary:
this resolves a race condition when a thread join was pending during
shutdown but a pipe write was needed in order for the join to be
successfully executed before shutdown had occurred
@fix
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5866
Reviewed-by: Cedric Bail <cedric@osg.samsung.com>
[Dereference after null check]
(1) src/lib/ecore/ecore_main.c
- _efl_loop_handler_efl_object_finalize checks if pd->loop_data is NULL.
After that, _handler_reset > _handler_clear > _ecore_main_fd_handler_del >
_ecore_main_fdh_pool_del is directly dereferencing pd->pool_data.
- _efl_loop_handler_efl_object_parent_set checks if pd->loop_data as well.
Then it calls _handler_reset as well.
(2) src/lib/ecore_wayland/ecore_wl_dnd.c
- ecore_wl_dnd_selection_set checks if t - result of wl_array_add - is NULL.
And it is dereferecing t directly for wl_data_source_offer.
(3) src/lib/elementary/efl_ui_dnd.c
- Third parameter const char *data could be NULL.
In this case strlen dereferences NULL. The data should be non NULL value.
I have checked this with Mr. Thiep Ha.
(4) src/lib/evas/canvas/evas_object_inform.c
- _efl_canvas_object_efl_gfx_stack_stack_below checks if obj->layer is NULL.
So it could call evas_object_inform_call_call_restack which is dereferencing
obj->layer directly.
well call sync returns a void * too.... instead of just void return
(nothing) but this makes it easier to write and maintain code due to
consistency of function callback signatures.
leave the exact numbers less defined because core count can change on
the fly and could be virtually limited by policy in future etc. so
keep things less exactly defined so people dont go depending on exact
results which was never really intended.
127 is the "command not found" shell exeit code, 126 is "the command
file is found but is not executable" which i think i'd interpret not
just for execute permissions but that something is preventing it from
executing in general.
both exe and thread objects must (currently) stay around until the
child thread or exe (task) is done. if you don't do this "bad things
can happen". so produce an error to let the programmer know.
For numeric types, eina_value_set() accepts values instead of references
on the value to be set. Hence, we were affecting as the exit code of the
loop a garbage value, yielding to invalid results.
so this is then inconsistent with efl.exe and efl.thread, so go back
to being normal with 0'th arg being the binary itself jsut to make
sure we have conistent usage.
this adds a simple indata and outdata void ptr to begin that you can
set on efl.thread objects (set the indata) and get the outdata too to
get results. then on the efl.appthread side the indata is set on the
efl.appthread before it runs and on quit the thresad can set the
outdata on the appthread, and this appears back on the efl.thread
object in the parent thread.
so you can basically share pointers to anything in and out this way on
start/exit in addition to string args etc.
the reason i made it an extra class (mixin actually) is for future
expansion. sharing more complex data - eina values maybe or objects as
long as they are shared objects, and perhaps acting as an interface
for calling a function at the other end like ecore_thread_async_call
etc.
so there is something broken in the complect efl promise/loop promise
that the clear of promises on loop destroy is clearing
promises/futures that have already triggered (loop timer ones). i've
spent enough time figuring out that it is happening.
_efl_loop_timeout_del() simple doenst ensure the future in
pending_futures for that promise is removed from the list. getting the
future from the promise handle is an exercise in pain... so i'm not
continuing with that path and will just ignore it.
but for now filling the promise data with null at least means if the
menory is re-used after free it wont see garbage freed ptrs and get
nulls so its easier to track.
so the MAIN loop is actually an efl.app object. which inherits from
efl.loop. the idea is that other loops in threads will not be efl.app
objects. thread on the creator side return an efl.thread object.
inside the thread, like the mainloop, there is now an efl.appthread
object that is for all non-main-loop threads.
every thread (main loop or child) when it spawns a thread is the
parent. there are i/o pipes from parnet to child and back. so parents
are generally expected to, if they want to talk to child thread, so
use the efl.io interfaces on efl.thread, and the main loop's elf.app
class allows you to talk to stdio back to the parent process like the
efl.appthread does the same using the efl.io interfaces to talk to its
parent app or appthread. it's symmetrical
no tests here - sure. i have been holding off on tests until things
settle. that's why i haven't done them yet. those will come back in a
subsequent commit
for really quick examples on using this see:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983118https://phab.enlightenment.org/F2983142
they are just my test code for this.
Please see this design document:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/w/efl-loops-threads/
This reverts commit 135154303b.
Revert "efl: move signal events from efl.loop to efl.app"
This reverts commit 3dbca39f98.
Revert "efl: add test suite for efl_app"
This reverts commit 3e94be5d73.
Revert "efl: create Efl.App class, the parent of Efl.Loop"
This reverts commit 28fe00b94e.
Go back to before efl.app because I think this should be done with
superclassing here not a parent object. reasons?
1. multiple loops per single thread make no sense. so if multilpe loop
objects they wont be contained in a single app object and then deleted
like this.
2. the app object is not really sharable in this design so it cant be
accessed from other threads
3. it makes it harder to get the main loop or app object (well 2 func
calls one calling the other and more typing. it is longer to type and
more work where it is not necessary, and again it can't work from
other threads unless we go duplicating efl.app per thread and then
what is the point of splittyign out the signal events from efl.loop
then?)
etc.
Some glibc declare write(2) with the attribute warn unused result.
So we now ensure that the calls to write(2) are successful. Otherwise,
we print an error and update errno accordingly.
Some glibc versions declare pipe(2) with a warn unused result attribute,
leading to compile-time warnings when pipe(2)'s return value is not
checked.
If pipe(2) fails, we now print an error and make the calling function
fail.
if its a non-legacy loop handler that also binds an fd handler
internally (the 2 things are linked as a pair) then on loop del, dont
del the objet as the obj del should handle things elsehwere.
this is astart of the work for having a common task class/interface
between loops, threads ane exe's so the i/o is all symmetric and works
the same way between all of them as well as similarly for launching
and knowing when the exit etc. etc.
this is not final and not perfect, but it's a start. comments of
course welcome
odd - i found ecore fd handlers basically ignored hangups from the
other end so we never knew if the other end went or not... crazy. now
we at least have all the read/write/error flags on and the next read
should fail indicating the broken pipe etc. ...
@fix
stealing the message data here prevents events which aren't being flushed from
ever being usable again and is unnecessary since the free callback will be
automatically called during the destructor
ref 5dd52fd09b
Summary:
This patch fixes a break of consistency of return data from ecore_event_del.
Before EFL 1.20, when calling ecore_event_add(ECORE_EVENT_SIGNAL_USER, event_data, NULL, &data);
The user data(data) is saved at event->data. and when user calls ecore_event_del(event_handler),
ecore_event_del returns event->data. However, current ecore_event_del returns pd->ev.
I think it is ABI break.
Test Plan: Execute test suite
Reviewers: cedric, raster, stefan_schmidt, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5786
Summary:
This patch checks for the valid types.
As mentioned API reference documentation, user must know its type before hand.
The type should be chedked like previous efl version and ecore_event_type_flush_internal()
Test Plan: Execute a ecore test suite.
Reviewers: cedric, raster, jpeg, stefan_schmidt, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5776
Summary:
This patch checks for the valid Ecore_Fd_Handler_Flags.
The flags should be checked like previous verion because
There are no default handlings in case of out of Ecore_Fd_Handler enum values in other funcs.
Test Plan: Execute a test case
Reviewers: cedric, raster, jpeg, stefan, Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5775
Summary:
This patch checks whether the callback function is valid or not.
Callback function must be set up for the class.
Test Plan: Execute test suite
Reviewers: cedric, raster, stefan, Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5762
Summary: This patch fixes a tentative crash owing to dereference of fd_handler.
Test Plan: Execute test suite
Reviewers: cedric, raster, stefan, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5754
Summary:
This patch fixes a tentative crash owing to null ptr dereference
ecore_animator_freeze() has a same patch already.
Test Plan: execute test suite
Reviewers: cedric, raster, jpeg, stefan, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5752
remove thread code since osx is not happy with threads trapping
signals (or at least a thread setting up the handler and trapping
there with signal blocks...). this should now work universally.
we used to do signals on main loop. keep doing. the pipes should work
in cleanly serializing the signals irrespective of when/where they are
caught (because we do into kernel and back out again). hoping this
makes osx work again. can't test as i have no osx box or vm. works on
linux and freebsd though.
this willonly apply to the main loop, but to be able to see these
signals as callbacks, we have to expose them. term/quit/int are
already handled internally where the loop will terminate (efl will
enforce this) AND ... there is a terminate event already on the loop
to deal with this cleanup. other signals really arent applicable IMHO
except usr1/2 and hup.
add efl_main_loop_steal() and efl_main_loop_release() for new efl
namespace versiosn of ecore_thread_main_loop_begin() and
ecore_thread_main_loop_end().
Marcel Hollerbach
Carsten Haitzler
Xavi Artigas
Derek Foreman
Christopher Michael
Lauro Moura
SangHyeon Jade Lee
Cedric BAIL
Hosang Kim
WooHyun Jung
Mike Blumenkrantz
Wonki Kim
Hermet Park
Cedric BAIL
Marcel Hollerbach
Jérémy Zurcher
Larry Lira
Vitor Sousa
Daniel Kolesa
Jaehyun Cho
Yeongjong Lee
junsu choi
Yeongjong Lee
Taehyub Kim
Shinwoo Kim
Myoungwoon Roy, Kim
Jean Guyomarc'h
Alastair Poole
Derek Foreman
Thierry HUCHARD
Zbigniew Kempczyński
Daniel Zaoui
Daniel Kolesa
Mike Blumenkrantz
Shinwoo Kim
Vincent Torri