Summary:
- Changed beta methods guards from CLASS_NAME_GUARD to
EFL_BETA_API_SUPPORT to use the same scheme as C.
- Removed some includes to Efl_Ui.h from the examples. These were
causing C's efl_part_get to not be generated due to EFL_PART_PROTECTED
not being yet defined (it is defined in Elementary.hh, included
afterwards). This was leading to Efl.Part.impl.hh trying to use a
non-existent method.
Fixes T7716 partially (missing stringshare issue)
Test Plan: make examples
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, felipealmeida, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7716
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8284
Summary:
these types are not currently being released and eolian should not have
generated legacy code using them
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8288
Summary:
This enables all the checks unconditionally, without ignoring
classes that don't have an Efl namespace. This required a lot
of beta marking to make it build. It most likely doesn't
mark types correctly, as that is not fully enabled yet.
Reviewers: zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8266
This reverts commit c876ac52d9.
This is not safe to remove - this breaks enlightenment. perhaps test
with the reason efl exists in the first place before delcaring it
safe? specifically this removed some function symbols in
efl_canvas_event_grabber_eo.legacy.c ...
Summary:
This commit changes the beta ness of a few types, those types are
looking quite stable. Edje types will likely not change. The
Efl.Gfx.Join types are actaully already stable since the last release,
since evas_vg was stable back then and those enums have been in there.
The elementary stuff looks a bit unthought, and we have the chance to
change the API in the backend, so maybe we want to not declare it
stable, but rather reintroduce the legacy types.
With this we can enable eolian generation of beta tags for types.
ref T7726
Depends on D8276
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi, zmike, stefan_schmidt, q66
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi, q66
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7726
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8277
Summary: This now does work, and we can enable the full checks
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, q66, zmike
Reviewed By: q66
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8276
the tiles rotator is faster no matter what. this will fix D8099 by
movoing to tiled rotation and nuking the neon code and we end uop
being faster anyway in all cases.
@fix
Summary:
With this we can drop the getenv in eolian, and enable beta checking per
default.
ref T7584
Depends on D8274
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, q66, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8275
Summary:
those types are now used in stable API, we should mark it stable.
ref T7584
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, q66, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7584
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8274
Summary:
there is no sense to have this outside beta, noone should really use
this. It is only meant for debugging purposes.
ref T7726
Depends on D8271
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7726
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8272
Summary:
in was not very descriptiv, move_in was concluded to be more descriptive
ref T7726
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, cedric, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7726
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8270
efl_ui_widget has a property called widget_parent. The setter for this
function is called is exactly once, and this is within the constructor,
to a value which is not even set to the actaul field parent_obj. Which
shows, that in the sitation right now, the setter of the property is a
bit disconnected and lags some real aspects.
As we are heading towards eo-api stabilization we should beat some sense
into this setter, as people using our classes might overwrite the setter
and except calls to it, whenever the widget_parent is changed, and
implementation as in elm_menu show that this might makes sense sometime.
In order to achive this, the sub_object registering code of elm is
adjusted a bit.
sub_object_add/del is now used to differenciate between evas objects and
efl.ui.widget objects as subobject. In case of a widget, the
widget_parent of this object is set, most of the widget specific code is
then executed in the actaul setter. In case of an evas object, the
parent reference is added. In the end both end up in the subobject
children list. The later is also a requirement for widget_parent_set to
be successfull.
ref T7553
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8031
before the widget_parent have been only set once. The call to the set
was in the constructor and carried the efl_parent. In the next commit
widget_parent is getting a refactor, which gives it more meaning, where
it is actaully called, which means, the behaviour will change. In order
to not break every existing usage of the here changed widgets, we move
the code to the constructor, and feed it with the efl_parent, just like
before.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8041
Getter are usually not modifying there object. This is going to put a strong
limit on what a getter property for MVVM is, as it will prevent any side
effect on getting a property from a View.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7969
This means that all property that are registered in the reflection table of
any Eo class will be available for binding with a model. This will increase
the amount of useful binding quickly.
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7941
this sucks but we've been using these types in legacy headers for years
and it's not something we can rush in a fix for
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8248
Summary:
these are all types that we do not currently want to release
Depends on D8102
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8241
Summary:
This removes all Eolian API that deals with handling of legacy
code. It also removes the code using it in the generator as well
as bindings, but for now keeps generation of .eo.legacy.h types,
as there are still instances in our codebase where things are
otherwise broken. We can remove the rest once that is resolved.
Reviewers: zmike, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8255
Summary:
This event can just be renamed, no need to handle legacy. The reason for
this, that this event is used to map to EVAS_CALLBACK_ enum fields,
which means, the legacy names of the event does not matter.
ref T7476
Reviewers: cedric, segfaultxavi, zmike, stefan_schmidt
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7476
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8242
Summary:
Since the removal of legacy interfaces from eo files, these files
contain nothing useful, and can safely be removed. One exception
is `efl_ui_layout.eo.legacy.h`, which will require more involved
work to remove, since a lot of things seem to depend on the
Efl_Ui_Layout typedef being present, wrongly (i suspect this
will break everything with `EFL_NOLEGACY_API_SUPPORT`).
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8251
Summary:
This patch remove evas_box function from Efl.Ui.Box_Flow and add unit test.
Depends on D8214
Test Plan:
1. make check
2. `elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.box'` with 'flow' checkbox.
Reviewers: zmike, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8219
Summary:
the DFS tree walk was accidently stopped by a too early return
statement. We should only return if we found a reflection entry, if not,
then we should continue our search
Depends on D7996
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, q66, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: cedric, zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7997
Summary:
This also simplifies the beta checking API by unifying it under
objects (makes much more sense that way) and reworks the validator
to have betaness support within its context state, allowing checks
to be done easily in any place.
The betaness checks are disabled for types for the time being,
because otherwise there are too many errors (types are assumed
to be stable as they are not tagged beta, but they reference beta
classes all over the place). Set EOLIAN_TYPEDECL_BETA_WARN to 1
in your environment to force enable the checks.
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n, stefan_schmidt, lauromoura, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl, #eolian
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8102
The other alternative would be to move callback_register/
callback_unregister from evas.canvas3d.object to evas.canvas3d.node.
However doing this right now is a bit hard based on the fact that no
example currently does render / work. Therefore the empty implementation
is the solution that does require fewer code movements.
ref T5719
Depends on D7759
Summary:
The edje_part_recalc calculates next postion(p3).
Please refer to following line.
p3->final.y = INTP(p1->final.y, p2->final.y, pos);
If the condition is as blow, then p3->final.y becomes -50 only if pos is 1.0.
Because INP uses TO_INT not TO_INT_ROUND.
p1->final.y == -32
p2->final.y == -50
So we had nonsmooth ending of transition.
Test Plan:
Sample application to check this issue. Please look carefully when the rect moves from bottom to top.
{F3627740}
{F3627739}
Reviewers: cedric, Hermet, jypark
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: zmike, akanad, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7842
Summary:
see 1b2401849a that said
`evas_object_smart_member_del` doesn't make sense here.
I guess `_sub_object_del` should have been used when item_all_contents_unset is
implemented.
Item content should have widget(gengrid) as the parent. but that relationship
is removed by c075b7caaa.
See also, `_item_content_realize` of genlist.
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: Hermet, SanghyeonLee, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: Hermet
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8238
It may occur some threading corruption, since ector raster uses thread
internally. Unfortunately the issue is rarely occured, hardly catch
the exact point. But I guess this ector drawing range may be the root cause.
Commented out them as it did before, until we could make the issue sure.
this requires a type that looks very sketchy
ref T7726
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8240
windows are not restricted to 90 degree rotations. also this type
shouldn't be stable yet
ref T7511
ref T7726
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8239
ideally Elementary.h should include only legacy code (T7667) and Efl_Ui.h
should include only eo code. this is not the case, and fixing it would
require undoing years of careful planning to make this type of thing extra
frustrating
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8233
I don't know what's going on here and I don't want to know.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8231
this is a legacy header so it can't include (non-installed) eo headers
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8229
this needs to include all the public headers as well as all the private
headers so that when it is included internally it correctly provides all
available function prototypes that are not static
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8228
for autotools this means adding more legacy headers to install, for
meson just some ??? headers
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8222
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8211
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8210
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8209
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8208
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8207
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8206
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8205
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8204
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8203
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8202
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8201
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8200
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8199
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8198
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8197
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8196
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8195
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8194
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8193
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8192
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8191
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8190
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8189
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8188
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8187
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8186
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8185
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8184
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8183
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8182
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8181
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8180
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8179
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8178
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8177
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8176
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8175
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8174
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8173
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8172
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8171
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8169
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8168
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8167
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8166
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8165
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8164
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8163
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8162
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8161
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8160
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8159
this currently has no counterpart in interface widgets but would be
useful there. removing the use of an elm_scroller type makes it independent
of legacy widgets, and it's still a beta api so at least future development
can be resumed at some point without much issue
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8158
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8157
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8156
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8155
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Daniel Kolesa <daniel@octaforge.org>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8154
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8153
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8152
Use restricted_min_set instead of min_set in layout_update.
min_set is set by public API(user side). if it is changed by internal function,
user will get unexpected value later. please check added test case.
Note that this reverts commit e013480e7a. instead,
this patch provides better solution of the issue refered in e013480e7.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8214
After this, it looks like this class is stable enough for release.
ref T7511
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8220
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8149
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8148
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8147
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8146
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8145
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8144
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8143
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8142
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8141
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
efl and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8140
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
the componenty and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8139
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8138
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8137
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8136
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8135
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8134
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8133
this was never released as legacy code so there's no point in having a
legacy enum
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8132
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8131
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8130
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8129
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8128
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8126
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8125
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8123
this is a legacy class and should not have its enum values defined
to an interface enum
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8122
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8121
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8120
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8119
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8118
When I amended https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7842 I removed line to handle
negative value size of params final in _edje_part_pixel_adjust.
Because It was not related to the what the commit wants to fix, and I could not find
the case making param final size value negative , although I got the negative value
when I tested on a specific case. Now it seems that the negative value is telling me
"Witness Me!".
So I would like to add this change, and never let me forget the issue.
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8105
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8108
this takes the current generated output from eolian for legacy code in
evas and adds it to the tree, then removes legacy references from the
corresponding eo files. in the case where the entire eo file was for
a legacy object, that eo file has been removed from the tree
ref T7724
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8107
Summary:
windows does not automatically set errno so we must do it ourselves
@fix
Depends on D8103
Reviewers: vtorri
Reviewed By: vtorri
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8104
Summary:
ensure that a nonzero return happens here so that failure cases can be
correctly detected
Reviewers: vtorri, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: bu5hm4n, raster, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8103
First..
Revert "elementary: Remove defined but not used function"
This reverts commit cfc167859a.
This func should exist. it has a reason to exist.. it somehow was not
being called anymore. this fixes that and calls it to avoid a leak.
@fix
Summary:
This patch fixes issue that parent hint size min is ignored when it is greater
than children hint size min sum.
Thanks to segfaultxavi for reporting this.
Test Plan:
1. make check
2. 'hello-gui' or 'texteditor' example in examples.git
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, zmike
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8098
Summary:
In EFL Ecore events are delivered to every created filter,
thus, because of reemiting events, some applications can receive
concrete event twice.
Path causing the issue occures:
(1) Window Manager sends a key event to activated application.
(2) The application which has _elm_atspi_bridge_key_filter sends the key event to screen-reader AT client.
(3) The screen-reader sends the key event back to the application if the screen-reader does not need to consume the key event.
(4) The application uses the key event.
We got an issue if an application uses another ecore_event_filter_add.
This patch replace asynchronous calling of "NotifyListenersSync" with synchronous one.
Thank to that answer from AT client is known in filter callback and there is no need to reemit events.
Reviewers: lukasz.stanislawski, rcybulski, kimcinoo, l.oleksak, Hermet, stanluk
Reviewed By: kimcinoo, stanluk
Subscribers: zmike, stanluk, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7246
Summary:
make this an array since there is no need to use a list here anyway
ref T7581
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7581
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8058
Summary:
the eo event needs to send position data and manually call the old
smart callback
Depends on D8086
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8087
Summary:
none of this should be released as api at this time
ref T7511
Depends on D8085
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7511
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8086
Summary:
this is fundamentally incompatible with many display servers and will
not ever be supported outside of legacy
ref T7511
Depends on D8083
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7511
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8084
Summary:
most of the eo methods here will be marked beta, preventing them from
generating legacy code
ref T7511
Depends on D8082
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7511
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8083
Summary:
now that the error codes have been change to be compatible with eina_error,
this can be removed and will work through eina_error naturally
fix T7718
Depends on D8067
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8068
Summary:
new api should not be bound to legacy values like this
ref T7718
Depends on D8064
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7718
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8066
Summary:
this can be mimicked with efl_provider_find as the top widget should
always be efl.ui.win
ref T7553
Depends on D8063
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8064
Summary:
this swaps the values of "no error" and "error" in order to maintain
consistency with the rest of efl where the zero value means "no error"
Depends on D8060
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8063
Summary: This was missing and caused C tutorials to break build.
Test Plan: ninja install and then try to build a C tutorial
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8096
Summary:
This commits adds dotnet as a supported C# platform for EFL# bindings.
Due to differences between Mono and Dotnet regarding DllImport, the
bindings now are using an imperative approach to load the function
pointers through the NativeModule and FunctionWrapper classes. These
classes handle the dlopen/LoadLibrary and dlsym/GetProcAddress calls.
Also, the previous caching of non-owned strings returned to native code
was removed until further memory checks.
We also had to create workaround for bool and chars in Structs for C#
marshaling. Going through System.Byte instead and Marshaling manually
to their respective types.
In order to actually build efl_mono.dll with dotnet right now,
issue #4782 from Meson should be fixed to make it properly detect and
used the Dotnet compiler. Also use "-Ddotnet=true" when running meson.
Fixes T7394
Reviewers: felipealmeida, vitor.sousa, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: vitor.sousa
Subscribers: cedric
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7394
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8069
efl_content leave the caller in charge of the lifecycle of the object. This means we can
rely on the factory to actually do something with the object before it is destroyed by anyone.
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8091
Summary:
It was marshalling erroneously data into and out of arrays and lists.
Instead of passing data by value (or by address of correct size), it was
stuffing data into IntPtr and trying to parse out afterwards.
This commit changes the binding to use the same approach of plain
Get/Set, with proper overloads.
Reviewers: vitor.sousa, segfaultxavi, felipealmeida
Reviewed By: vitor.sousa
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8057
This also enable to create a tree of Container_Model instead of just one level.
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8046
This patch allow Efl.Composite_Model to return always the same object for the same index.
This way, it make it easier for the Model to always be in sync even if there is multiple
user at any time. The support for dummy object allow the Composite_Model to host more
object than what the source model provide. This dummy model will only have the property
of the Composite_Model and none of the Source model ofcourse.
Reviewed-by: Vitor Sousa da Silva <vitorsousa@expertisesolutions.com.br>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8045
This feature was kind of ill-conceived and never worked properly.
Since there isn't enough time to make it work right at this point
and there are no users of it in the API, remove it for now.
It might get added in the next release cycle, in a proper form.
@feature
Summary:
minimize is a commonly used term in the current year. iconify is not.
ref T7511
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7511
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8044
Summary:
Its hard to say why removing such calls are fixing a bug like T7274.
However, it appears that this call causes the min size calculation of
evas to fall apart. This also removes a workarround introduced earlier
to fix this.
This fixes T7274
Reviewers: zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7274
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8043
Summary:
This fixes compilation on Windows
More precisely edje_cc could not compile emotion edc files, so it was a runtime problem
because of msvcr100 link.
Add more tests than before
Test Plan: compilation
Reviewers: raster
Subscribers: zmike, stefan_schmidt, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7926
Meson from git complains if `install` is set but not `install_dir`.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8036
Make sure we are use doubel also also in things like EINA_DBL_EQ(a-b, x+y).
Thanks to Vicent for reporting and Xavi for giving me context.
Reviewed-by: Vincent Torri <vincent.torri@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8049
This adds support for inlist structs, a special type of struct
that can only be used with inlists. This differs from regular
structs in a couple ways:
1) They are stored separately. Just like structs, enums, aliases
have their own storage, so do inlist structs.
2) They can't be @extern, nor they can be opaque.
3) They are their own type of typedecl.
4) When they contain only one field, this field must be a value
type always, cannot be a pointer.
Like regular structs, they can have arbitrary fields, and they
can have a pre-set free function via @free().
In C, the inlist structs will be generated exactly like ordinary
ones, except they will have EINA_INLIST before the first field.
Other binding generators can deal with them as they wish, for
example to provide high level interfaces to them.
This does not yet do the plumbing necessary to hook these into
the type system, nor it adds generator support.
@feature
Most of classes implements Efl.Container.content_remove are just calling "unpack"
except of "Efl.Canvas.Layout" and "Efl.Ui.Layout".
This patch remove the asymmetrical API and add content_remove API of
"Efl.Canvas.Layout" and "Efl.Ui.Layout" that child can be remove without efl_part
APIs.
ref T7576
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <marcel-hollerbach@t-online.de>
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7913
Summary:
this just prints a error, manipulating the content here is not
permitted. As it is created by edje externals, which are owned by edje.
ref T5719
Depends on D7757
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: q66, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5719
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7759
Summary:
Homogeneous mode means children are of the same weight and of the same min size
which is determined by maximum min size of cells.
Depends on D7841
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, jpeg, zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7892
Summary:
There are three reasons to refactor layout_update of Efl.Ui.Table.
=== 1. Inconsistency of hint behavior. ===
Some hint property is often not respected. for example, hint_min is ignored in
Table when it is used with hint_max even if hint_weight is 0. hint_aspect is
always ignored in Table.
The ambiguous behavior make it hard to layout widgets in container. of course,
we documented 'it's just a hint that should be used whenever appropriate.' but i
don't think it means that 'hint API is sometimes respected and we also don't
know when that API is respected.'. at least there is rule for consistent
behavior and we should be able to explain why a widget is located here and
why some hint property is ignored.
So, i'll suggest priority of hint property. this refactoring support following
priority.
1) HintMin
2) HintMin + HintAspect
3) HintMargin
4) HintMax
5) HintAspect
6) HintWeight, HintFill
7) HintAlign
ref T5487
Please check with unit test D7840
=== 2. To Enhance usability. ===
Efl.Ui.Table is using homogeneous mode of evas_table which have same columns,
rows size. but i think a table can generally change columns, rows size and
we can provide homogeneous mode option.(D7892)
In this patch
- table columns(rows) min size is decided by maximum size among its cells
width(height) min size.
- table columns(rows) weight is decided by maximum weight among its cells
horizontal(vertical) weight.
Also, pack_align is implemented. it is used if no item has a weight.
=== 3. To remove internal evas_table. ===
This is low priority work. however, i guess is is necessary for lightweight
container widget. there are two size_hint callback to adjust table size and
efl_canvas_group_calculate is called twice when it is resized.
This patch is first step to remove internal evas_table.
Test Plan:
make check
elementary_test -to 'efl.ui.table'
Reviewers: jpeg, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: zmike, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T5487
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7841
summary_:
pd->logical.child_count is a counter where focusable children do
register themself in the parent if they can be focused or not. With this
we don't need the updating of this internal flag nor the flag itself anymore.
Depends on D8027
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8030
summary_:
interest_region_mode makes it possible, that interest_region_get either
returns WIDGET or ITEM coordinates. However, efl-api does not have
items. That means, this can be legacy.
ref T7553
Depends on D8026
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8027
summary_:
show_region is simular to focus_region. However, it builds up on setting
custom functions per setter to the widget, which are then executed. This
can be solved better by overwriting the interest_region getter, and
using a function like elm_widget_focus_region_show (This function still
needs to find its place in the eo api).
ref T7553
Depends on D8025
Reviewers: woohyun, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8026
summary_:
the widget implementation just redirected calls from efl_ui_widget to
efl_ui_win. Which makes the properties unncessesary on the widget. This
commit moves them now to the window.
The legacy implementation of the window can now go away, as this is
taken care of by eolian directly.
ref T7553
Depends on D8017
Reviewers: woohyun
Reviewed By: woohyun
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Reviewed-by: WooHyun Jung <woohyun0705@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8025
before the disable property was a bit weird. Setting something to
disabled=true will disable all children of the widget that is changed.
However, only the update function of the children will get the false flag,
not the flag itself. Which means, to query the real disabled state, we
need to walk up the parent relations.
With this patch, every change to disabled will go through the disabled
property, which mean, a implementor can just overwrite the disabled
property, and adjust its internal state there. Just be carefull, a set
to disabled=true still might result in disabled=false. This makes the
function on_disable_update unneccesary. Which also cleans up the
Efl.Ui.Widget class.
ref T7553
Depends on D8016
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8017
summary_:
those objects are disabled anyways, because disabled is applied to the
objects in a tree. Which means, subobjects of a widget are disabled
whenever the widget is disabled anyways.
Depends on D8015
Reviewers: cedric, zmike, segfaultxavi, stefan_schmidt
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8016
The new api is moved into either Efl.Ui.Win or Efl.Ui.Layout.
Only Efl.Ui.Layout is interested in the rotation, as this is the only
widget that can actaully apply it to the theme. The value itself however
is unique to the window, which means, the window is the only point where
the rotation is stored, and this is the point, where rotation changes
are brought to the layouts.
ref T7553
Depends on D8014
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8015
Summary:
this new API can be used to get a easy to use iterator, to iterate
through all the children of a specific widget.
ref T7553
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: woohyun, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7553
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8014
Summary:
instead of passing a string which requires reading docs to know which
arbitrary string key=value sets can be passed, use an extensible struct
which contains more easily referenced values
ref T7672
Depends on D8035
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7672
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8039
Summary:
api naming in efl uses 'del' when deleting an object and 'remove' when
removing something from an object
ref T7554
Depends on D8034
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7554
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8035
Summary:
most widgets inherit from layout to provide implementations for common
functionality such as content/text/theme get+set.
one of the things that layout also brings into its inheritance hierarchy
is efl.file and implementations for its methods. this becomes a problem
when the widget which inherits layout also wants to provide implementations
for efl.file methods (e.g., entry, which uses efl.file to load text files)
as it will result in calling all of the efl.file implementations up the
chain.
in the case of entry, this could result in the 'file' property eventually being
set to the current theme file in use by the entry's layout object, and then the
entry will attempt to autosave its content to the default theme file when it is
destroyed, corrupting the theme file and breaking everything
to solve this:
* efl.ui.layout remains an instantiable class which implements efl.file
* efl.ui.layout_base is the abstract class which provides all the methods of layout
but should be inherited by all widgets which want to implement efl.file functionality
Depends on D8018
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8032
Summary:
the previous implementation/api had a number of issues:
* "file" property contained both "file" and "key" values
- also performed file loading operation
* "load_error" property which was specific to image objects
* no methods for controlling file loading/unloading
this patch attempts the following changes:
* split "file" property into "file" and "key" properties
- also remove "key" from existing "mmap" property
* remove "load_error"
* directly return error codes from operations
* add "load" and "unload" methods for directly controlling load state
* add implicit file loading if file/mmap is set during construction
* rewrite all efl.file implementations to move file loading into load() method
* rewrite all usage of efl.file api based on these changes
* add C extension functions to mimic previous behavior
ref T7577
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n, cedric
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: vitor.sousa, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7577
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8018
Summary: this resolves a considerable number of leaks in unit tests
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8020
Summary:
Make more robust elm_map even if the user wipe is cache directory
or import an already filled tile cache.
@fix T7443
Reviewers: zmike, cedric
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: thierry1970, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7443
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7617
Summary:
this requires some internal hackery to preserve legacy compatibility
and correctly translate the single new event into two legacy events
ref T7558
Depends on D8018
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: bu5hm4n, segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_api
Maniphest Tasks: T7558
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8019
Lauro Moura
Mike Blumenkrantz
Daniel Kolesa
Yeongjong Lee
Hermet Park
Carsten Haitzler
Marcel Hollerbach
Cedric BAIL
Daniel Kolesa
Shinwoo Kim
Yeongjong Lee
Xavi Artigas
Mike Blumenkrantz
Christopher Michael
Lukasz Wlazly
Felipe Magno de Almeida
Vitor Sousa
Vincent Torri
Stefan Schmidt
Hosang Kim
Michaël Bouchaud (yoz)
