forked from enlightenment/efl
66370 Commits
Author | SHA1 | Message | Date |
---|---|---|---|
|
ff840ba26c |
ecore_buffer: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_BUFFER_API in Ecore Buffer library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
d37234b2a4 |
ecore_cocoa: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_COCOA_API in Ecore Cocoa library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
caffa66952 |
ecore_evas: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_EVAS_API in Ecore Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.de> |
|
|
41cefb11a9 |
ecore_fb: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_FB_API in Ecore FB library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
c3afa1cffe |
ecore_file: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_FILE_API in Ecore File library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
150a00f92e |
ecore_imf: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_IMF_API in Ecore IMF library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
cee432a2a3 |
ecore_input_evas: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_INPUT_EVAS_API in Ecore Input Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
b83e9567d9 |
ecore_ipc: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_IPC_API in Ecore IPC library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
aec4e4c2cd |
eet: Rename EAPI macro to EET_API in Eet library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
9818a8105e |
efreet: Rename EAPI macro to EFREET_API in Efreet library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
21674baf68 |
ecore_win32: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_WIN32_API in Ecore Win32 library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
1dba2f717a |
emile: Rename EAPI macro to EMILE_API in Emile library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
8306808aee |
eeze_api: Rename EAPI macro to EEZE_API in Eeze library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
d3c091366c |
elput: Rename EAPI macro to ELPUT_API in Elput library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
f1cf6466a5 |
elua: Rename EAPI macro to ELUA_API in Elua library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
371187cab1 |
embryo: Rename EAPI macro to EMBRYO_API in Embryo library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
9b3acd4209 |
ethumb: Rename EAPI macro to ETHUMB_API in Ethumb library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
55a1c1772f |
ecore_drm2: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_DRM2_API in Ecore DRM2 library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
61da769307 |
ecore_avahi: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_AVAHI_API in Ecore Avahi library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
9eff6d7cfa |
ecore_drm: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_DRM_API in Ecore DRM library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
9acf600850 |
ecore_x: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_X_API in Ecore X library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
07240e0d41 |
edje_cxx: Remove useless EAPI definition
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
b8dccb3154 |
edje: Rename EAPI macro to EDJE_API in Edje library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
dca12dc6b3 |
elementary: Rename EAPI macro to ELM_API in Elementary library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> |
|
|
08ba516b64 |
eina_cxx: Rename EAPI macro to EINA_CXX_TEST_API in Einna C++ tests
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
e36de1c37c |
edje_cxx: Edje.hh depends on already set EAPI, explicitly define
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. So we can remove EAPI from other libraries, we need to make this library non-dependent on this symbol being already defined. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
bb895cde36 |
modules: Rename EAPI macro to MODAPI for modules
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
bbd817c9a1 |
efl_mono: Rename EAPI macro to EFL_MONO_API in efl mono binding
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
7df163582e |
edje: Add weak symbol
The symbols will be needed when we change how Eolian generates import/export symbols in Eio |
|
|
cc5bf64e66 |
elementary: Remove use of EOAPI that will get its definition removed
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
e00417edf4 |
efl: Rename EAPI macro to EFL_API in Efl sub-library
evil: Rename EAPI macro to EVIL_API in Evil library Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
ea6f250683 |
ecore: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_API in Ecore library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
4bca3f7555 |
eldbus: Rename EAPI macro to ELDBUS_API in Eldbus library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
05dba646ae |
emotion: emotion EAPI macro to EMOTION_API in Emotion library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
6fbb5595ff |
ector: Rename EAPI macro to ECTOR_API in Ector library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
98dcee2dd1 |
ecore_con: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_CON_API in Ecore Con library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass ```__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))``` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as ```__atttribute__((visibility("default")))```. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> |
|
|
89b839600e |
evas: Rename EAPI macro to EVAS_API in Evas library
Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> |
|
|
7ad0a1447f |
ecore_audio: Rename EAPI macro to ECORE_AUDIO_API in Ecore Audio library
Summary: Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12212 |
|
|
b495328a30 |
evil: Fix fcntl for F_SETLK and F_SETLKW wrong length calculation
Summary: If length and start are both 0, size is wrongfully negative. Besides, using length as a delimitator in a range means that [0, length) is a half-closed interval, so we don't need to subtract by 1. Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, lucas, jptiz Reviewed By: vtorri, lucas Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12208 |
|
|
f563b99917 |
eio: Rename EAPI macro to EIO_API in Eio library
Summary: Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, lucas, jptiz Reviewed By: vtorri, lucas Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12210 |
|
|
baa40d623a |
Fixing conversion from size_t to high-low dwords for _WIN64.
Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, lucas, jptiz Reviewed By: vtorri, jptiz Subscribers: joaoantoniocardoso, cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12207 |
|
|
ccbce36d91 |
evil: Define environ macro when using VS based on UCRT definition
Summary: Microsoft Visual Studio defines _environ, but not environ. Create a macro #define environ _environ like other analogous solutions Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, joaoantoniocardoso, lucas, jptiz Reviewed By: jptiz Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12209 |
|
|
eec1680b56 |
eo: Rename EAPI macro to EO_API in Eo library
Summary: Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Reviewers: jptiz, lucas, vtorri, woohyun Reviewed By: jptiz, lucas, vtorri Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12203 |
|
|
d05157e96a |
eldbus: Add Eldbus.h include entry point header to eldbus_instrospection.h
Summary: Add #include Eldbus.h so we can have EAPI definition for eldbus_instrospection.h header Reviewers: jptiz, lucas, vtorri, woohyun Reviewed By: vtorri Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12202 |
|
|
d9dd85fec3 |
eio: Add weak symbol
Summary: Add definition for EAPI_WEAK because this macro will be needed when we change how Eolian generates import/export symbols for the Eio library. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Reviewers: jptiz, lucas, vtorri, woohyun Reviewed By: vtorri Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12201 |
|
|
dfa446873e |
benchmark: Remove unnecessary import and export macros from benchmark executables
Summary: Benchmark executables do not need to export and import symbols because they are not loaded by other executables. Removing is important because EAPI will be removed in some later commit and would break benchmark executables. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, jptiz, lucas Reviewed By: vtorri Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12200 |
|
|
25a1142493 |
eolian: Add -e parameter to pass export symbol to eolian generator
Summary: Eolian generator must have a parameter so it can generate the correct symbol export/import macro for the API generated. This makes it possible to define the symbols as being local to a single DSO without the need to guard the generated headers or generated source files with #define and #undef preprocessor statements. = The Rationale = This patch is from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why LIBAPI is the only solution that works for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Reviewers: q66, vtorri, woohyun, jptiz, lucas Reviewed By: vtorri, lucas Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12197 |
|
|
35b7458832 |
eolian: Rename EAPI macro to EOLIAN_API in Eolian library
Summary: Patch from a series of patches to rename EAPI symbols to specific library DSOs. EAPI was designed to be able to pass `__attribute__ ((visibility ("default")))` for symbols with GCC, which would mean that even if -fvisibility=hidden was used when compiling the library, the needed symbols would get exported. MSVC __almost__ works like GCC (or mingw) in which you can declare everything as export and it will just work (slower, but it will work). But there's a caveat: global variables will not work the same way for MSVC, but works for mingw and GCC. For global variables (as opposed to functions), MSVC requires correct DSO visibility for MSVC: instead of declaring a symbol as export for everything, you need to declare it as import when importing from another DSO and export when defining it locally. With current EAPI definitions, we get the following example working in mingw and MSVC (observe it doesn't define any global variables as exported symbols). Example 1: dll1: ``` EAPI void foo(void); EAPI void bar() { foo(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI void foo() { printf ("foo\n"); } ``` This works fine with API defined as __declspec(dllexport) in both cases and for gcc defining as `__atttribute__((visibility("default")))`. However, the following: Example 2: dll1: ``` EAPI extern int foo; EAPI void foobar(void); EAPI void bar() { foo = 5; foobar(); } ``` dll2: ``` EAPI int foo = 0; EAPI void foobar() { printf ("foo %d\n", foo); } ``` This will work on mingw but will not work for MSVC. And that's why EAPI is the only solution that worked for MSVC. Co-authored-by: João Paulo Taylor Ienczak Zanette <jpaulotiz@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Ricardo Campos <ricardo.campos@expertise.dev> Co-authored-by: Lucas Cavalcante de Sousa <lucks.sousa@gmail.com> Reviewers: vtorri, woohyun, jptiz, lucas Reviewed By: vtorri Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12196 |
|
|
567387aab0 |
efl_mono: Use architecture independent ECANCELED
Summary: `efl_mono` was assuming ECANCELED as in Linux, which made some tests fail. `test_simple_futere_cancel` and `test_cancel_after_resolve` checks if the returned error code is `ECANCELED` but `Eina.Error.ECANCELED` was base on Linux `ECANCELED` which is diferent from OSX causing: ``` [ ERROR ] AssertionException: /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/Promises.cs:138 (test_simple_future_cancel) Left hand side "Eina.Error(89)", right hand side "Eina.Error(125)" at Test.AssertEquals[T](T lhs, T rhs, String msg, Int32 line, String file, String member) in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/TestUtils.cs:line 73 at TestSuite.TestPromises.test_simple_future_cancel() in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/Promises.cs:line 138 [ FAIL ] TestPromises.test_simple_future_cancel ``` ``` [ ERROR ] AssertionException: /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/Promises.cs:256 (test_cancel_after_resolve) Left hand side "Eina.Error(89)", right hand side "Eina.Error(125)" at Test.AssertEquals[T](T lhs, T rhs, String msg, Int32 line, String file, String member) in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/TestUtils.cs:line 73 at TestSuite.TestPromises.test_cancel_after_resolve() in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/Promises.cs:line 256 [ FAIL ] TestPromises.test_cancel_after_resolve ``` And `iwraper.cs:WrapAssync` was only considering Linux `ECANCELED` thus causing a rise of an `Efl.FutureException: Future failed` instead of the expected `TaskCanceledException` making fail at `TestEoAsyncMethods.test_async_cancel`: ``` [ RUN ] TestEoAsyncMethods.test_async_cancel [ ERROR ] AssertionException: Assertion failed: /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/EoPromises.cs:175 (test_async_cancel) AggregateException must have been TaskCanceledException at Test.Assert(Boolean res, String msg, Int32 line, String file, String member) in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/TestUtils.cs:line 53 at TestSuite.TestEoAsyncMethods.<>c.<test_async_cancel>b__1_0(Exception x) in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/EoPromises.cs:line 175 at System.AggregateException.Handle(Func`2 predicate) at TestSuite.TestEoAsyncMethods.test_async_cancel() in /Users/lucas/expertise/efl1/src/tests/efl_mono/EoPromises.cs:line 171 [ FAIL ] TestEoAsyncMethods.test_async_cancel ``` Depends on D12156 Test Plan: Compare with master and note that with this diff all tests pass. - Configure as especified by Enlightenment man page + `-Dbindigns=mono -Ddotnet=true`: ``` meson -Dsystemd=false -Dv4l2=false -Davahi=false -Deeze=false -Dx11=false -Dopengl=full -Dcocoa=true -Dnls=false -Demotion-loaders-disabler=gstreamer1,libvlc,xine -Decore-imf-loaders-disabler=scim,ibus -Dbindigns=cxx,mono -Ddotnet=true build ``` - Build normally - Test `efl-mono-suite` Reviewers: felipealmeida Reviewed By: felipealmeida Subscribers: ProhtMeyhet, cedric, #reviewers, #committers, woohyun Tags: #efl Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12157 |
|
|
cf5884de1b |
efl-mono: Correctly load dynamic libs for OSX
Summary: OSX libs end with `.dylib`, so it made failed to load libs, for instance dl name is `dl.dylib` making it unable to load as it was before (`libdl.so`). Test Plan: Compare with master and note that this diff is able to fail on tests, and not about importing libs. - Configure as especified by Enlightenment man page + `-Dbindigns=mono -Ddotnet=true`: ``` meson -Dsystemd=false -Dv4l2=false -Davahi=false -Deeze=false -Dx11=false -Dopengl=full -Dcocoa=true -Dnls=false -Demotion-loaders-disabler=gstreamer1,libvlc,xine -Decore-imf-loaders-disabler=scim,ibus -Dbindigns=cxx,mono -Ddotnet=true --prefix=$PWD/prefix build ``` - Build normally - Test `efl-mono-suite` Reviewers: felipealmeida Reviewed By: felipealmeida Subscribers: stefan_schmidt, cedric, #reviewers, #committers, woohyun Tags: #efl, #expertise_solutions Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D12156 |