I'm sorry, but those kind of commit messages are unacceptable for code
I'm the only maintainer of. It's bad enough that to have them in the
project in general, but this I won't accept.
I wanted to review this commit, but the lack of explanation about what
you are trying to fix and why you think this is the good fix prevents me
from doing my job. However, without really looking too much into it,
this commit looks wrong. evas_textblock_cursor_format_is_visible_get
should verify there's a format node...
Please come up with a better commit message and re-commit.
This reverts commit fe33aa7408.
This one fix size of the object that didn't take into account the style
of the text since we added the support of ellipsis in Evas. It also
correctly detect when we insert an ellipsis in the text to relayout
properly on resize.
We can't use ECORE_CON_LIBS at the examples/ "make" context
since it defines libraries relative to the src/ directory
(e.g. lib/ecore/libecore.la). Use ECORE_CON_COMMON_LDADD instead.
This fixes the following link error with ecore_fd_handler_gnutls_example
when the project is configured with --with-crypto=gnutls:
libtool: link: cannot find the library `lib/ecore/libecore.la'
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>
Only specify ecore_pipe_gstreamer_example in EXTRA_PROGRAMS inside the
HAVE_GSTREAMER makefile guard.
Fixes: https://phab.enlightenment.org/T423
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff <ullysses.a.eoff@intel.com>
This add finally support for JPEG 2000, but be aware that libopenjpeg
is very badly managed. There is currently only version 1.5.x that does
provide the right files, is usable by a third party and portable. You
can seriously forget any other version.
when using genlist and the edje item objects, there seem to be a lot
of excess textblock layouts happening. i was seeing about 12 layouts per tb
part in the edje before this patch. with this it's down to about 3.
Only the key is worth being a stringshare as it is used to do an efficient
binary comparison instead of iterating over all possibility. Also reused
some already known value and a few other speedup.
This reverts commit 1714fe93f4.
We actually want this type, it makes things clearer.
Conflicts:
src/tests/eo/function_overrides/function_overrides_inherit2.c
src/tests/eo/function_overrides/function_overrides_simple.c
src/tests/eo/suite/eo_test_class_simple.c
This reverts commit ee1b0833ed
I did it manually because the code changed too much.
We actually want this type, it makes things more clear and easier to
understand.