during cursor free a move cb seems to add another job again after it
wss already deleted during the free process, so just clear the job
really late instead. valgrind found this one
@fix
If pointer is processed by a container in its POINTER_MOVE event
callback, then clickable calls efl_ui_clickable_button_state_reset not
to be clicked by efl_ui_clickable_unpress.
e.g. Efl.Ui.Active_View.View_Manager_Scroll sets pointer processed in
POINTER_MOVE event callback not to click button during scrolling.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9204
this adds a testsuite to emulate and check the usage of buttons in the
spin button widget. This also verifies that the correct events are
emitted. (For now, the testcases from spin are also copied over, since
they inherit from each other)
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9232
before the spin event for changing the value was called twice if you
changed the value by the entry. Additionally, the changed,delay event is
not emitted when the value was changed via the arrow buttons.
This corrects this, additionally, this enables the delay timer when
focus is gone, this is expected and should be supported by the API.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9231
this reduces the amount of code needed in the widget itself,
additionally, the theme now follows a scheme.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9230
there is no reason to store those two times in the internal data, as
they do not change at all. Additionally, saving the direction in the
internal data has also no reason, since it is *always* used in the call
after the setting, so this makes this a parameter.
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9229
this makes the code more readable, and reduces the amount of events we
are subscribing to.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9227
doing this in pressed is kind of weird, if you are on a touchscreen,
missclick, and move the finger away, the entry is already transformed,
which is weird, this fixes that.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9226
this was just reimplementing existing behaviour. This can be done more
easily
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9224
this commits introduces unified behaviour for the users of the range
interfaces. This includes:
- The same errors for limit_set errors
- The same errors for value setting outside the range
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9241
this tests for the correct event emission. And checks the wheel
interaction.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9221
Some docs have been filled with placeholder text ("TBD") or with preliminary
text (marked with //TODO).
Having 0 doc warning we can now enable Warnings as Errors in mono, and in Eolian later on.
View is something that is expected in the context of MVVM, so using it somewhere else is
going to lead to some confusion. Spotlight does descrive the objective of all of this
widget in actually a more explicit way as they all give the spotlight to one sub widget
at a time.
I have also renamed the View_Manager to be just Manager as the View there wasn't useful.
this commit ensures 2 things:
1. This ensures that the parent is not evaluated when there was no state
changed, this cuts down roughly 30% of the calls to full_eval
2. This ensures that we only listen to parent manager changes when we
are actaully registered. This reduces the amount spend in event emission
a lot.
This class helps widgets which contain a numerical value and must display it,
like Progressbar (units label), Spin, Spin_Button, Slider (both units and popup
labels, in legacy), Tags (when in shrunk mode) or Calendar (year_month label).
Previously this was a mix of interface and mixin: widgets had to support setting a
formatting func, and the mixin offered support for formatting strings, by setting
an internal formatting func. On top of that, the spinner widget supported "special
values", a list of values that should be shown as certain strings instead.
This has now been simplified and unified:
Widgets including this mixin can use the formatted_value_get() method which accepts
an Eina_Value and returns a string. Thats's it.
The mixin adds three properties to the widget (format_values, format_func and
format_string) which users can use to tailor formatting. The widget does not need
to know which method has been used, it just retrieves the resulting string.
This removes a lot of duplicated widget code, and adds functionality which was
missing before. For example, all widgets support passing a list of values now.
Widgets must implement the apply_formatted_value() method so they are notified
of changes in the format and they can redraw anything they need.
Tests have been added to the Elementary Spec suite for all cases.
Legacy widgets behavior has not been modified, although a few needed some code
changes.
from now on, the "changed" signal is only emitted on radio/check buttons when
the user interacted with this object. NOT due to the API change.
However, in the eo-api the event is emitted all the time, due to user
interaction, AND due to API interaction.
ref T8042
Summary:
Add a property (show_progress_label) to allow controlling whether the progress
label displaying the exact progress is shown or not.
This was possible in Legacy but the functionality was lost in Unified.
Updated elementary_test to showcase this property, and also the other label
formatting options, which where not tested anywhere.
Added a simple progressbar unit test. It only checks that retrieved value is the
same as the set value, so it is more of a placeholder for future tests.
**This is needed by a future patch which will introduce more formatting options that clash with the current implementation.**
The presence of a formatting function was used to decide if the progress label was shown or not. This explicit property simplifies things.
Test Plan:
Everything builds and passes tests.
`elementary_test -to Efl.Ui.Progressbar` should show a few more bars with different formatting labels, and a checkbox to toggle rendering of one of them.
Reviewers: bu5hm4n, zmike, cedric
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9202
Summary: this is actually a new class, it should be included here.
Reviewers: zmike, stefan_schmidt
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9200
Summary:
Previously, view position was moved by click because transition
information was initialized in mouse move instead of mouse down.
Now, transition information is initialized in mouse down so view
position is not moved by click.
Test Plan:
1. Run Efl.Ui.Active_View Scroll
2. Click Next button 2 times
3. Click Button Page
Or
3. Drag Button Page a bit to the left and click multiple times
Reviewers: bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: bu5hm4n
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9173
Summary:
this doesn't seem to serve a purpose anymore and there's no point in
keeping it in tree
fix T7866
Reviewers: woohyun, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl_widgets
Maniphest Tasks: T7866
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9176
this object is swallowed into a layout, which means the layout will be managing
this property
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9151
Summary: the event type was wrong. This is now fixed and works correctly.
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9144
It appears that EVAS_CALLBACK_FOCUS_IN / OUT is wrong here, as this is
for when a object gets focus but not the scene.
However, the inital event emission still does not work correctly, this
needs some further investigation.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9138
tool was not very helpfull, and additionally, the docuemtnation of it
was completly wrong. After searching through the code where tool was
actaully set (efl_ui_win.c) it turned out that it is actaully the "id"
of the pointer when there are multiple touch events.
ref T7963
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9135
This is a bit of a giant commit. However, the problem here is that
cleaning up the API went hand in hand with rewriting most of the usages.
In the process of renewing and removing old API the following was done:
- Legacy API testcases have been ported back to smart callbacks
- EO-API testcases have been ported to efl_add syntax
- weird event #defines have been removed
- Wrong constructor usage has been removed
- Ported to the new box object introduced before
- removed legacy API from efl_ui_radio
-> no more ptr(int) q66 will do jumps of happiness
-> no more ununderstandable group_add methods
-> Seperated code in blocks only for legacy, and blocks only for
non-legacy
To verify this commit, you can check all the tests that have been
touched here. Additionally, the cxx example has been adjusted
ref T7867
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9060
in previous versions of this widget, the calls that are available due to
inheritance did not work. efl_ui_check_selected_set did not work on a
radio button. However, the internal function _state_set did just exactly
that. So this commit refactors the activity emitting out of the
function, so the _state_set function can just be used as the
efl_ui_check_selected set function.
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9059
Radio_Group is a interface that manages that radio groups can be grouped inside a
external object, the current API of radio was considered confusing in
that regard. It is implemented in the Radio_Group_Internal class which
is private to EFL, a instance of it can be found with get due to the
class function in efl_ui_radio.eo. This architecture was taken like
this, in order to have implementation and interface seperated. With
those two seperated we can inherit from regular widgets, implement the
interface, and composite attach the internal object to the regular
widget. This makes a lot of things easier.
Radio_Box is a class which is extending Efl.Ui.Box, which has an
internal Radio_Group. This is extremly usefull for cases where you just
want to have a list of radio buttons in your UI. The radio group is also
exposed using composition to the internal object. Simular things can be
done for the table.
For now i did not add API to find the group of a radio button. However,
this can be quickly added if requested.
ref T7867
Reviewed-by: Mike Blumenkrantz <michael.blumenkrantz@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xavi Artigas <xavierartigas@yahoo.es>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9058
Just fixed a backward compatibility issue in elm_slider.
Now it calls "delay,changed" as it had done previously.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9130
when the activeview is being destroyed, we can skip a lot of steps in
unregistering widgets due to hierarchy-enforced deletion and class
chaining of destructors.
on the flip side, we also need to be cautious of triggering codepaths that
will perpetuate object lifecycles past when they should be destroyed and
trigger unwanted behavior.
for this case, when the activeview is being destroyed we can simply efl_del
all the contents to reuse existing callbacks, and then we can skip doing
all the update propagation through activeview subcomponents since those will
be destroyed presently. also, these subcomponents already handle subobject
destruction with callbacks, so they'll automatically clean everything up.
probably.
Reviewed-by: Marcel Hollerbach <mail@marcel-hollerbach.de>
Reviewed-by: Cedric BAIL <cedric.bail@free.fr>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9125
this can now be done with active_view. This is done in order to reduce
the LOC in elementary that basically do the same.
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8920
Summary:
And update the docs to explain its purpose.
Related to T7893
Test Plan: Everything builds and tests pass
Reviewers: zmike, bu5hm4n
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9090
Summary:
check can only display 2 states, and is only designed to do so.
Additionally, nstate inherits from button, which
brings in autorepeat, which is hileriously broken on check and cannot
really work.
Right now there is not even support in the theme for clickable. So its a
good idea to get rid of this for now IMO.
ref T7865
Reviewers: stefan_schmidt, zmike, segfaultxavi, akanad, YOhoho
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7865, T7867
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9018
we don't force buffers to flush in wl... this will fix that and force
them removing an ugly hang for possibly seconds in cnp from client to
client or even within a client.
remember:
flush your mush.
@fix
Summary: it crashes when calling elm_interface_scrollable_loop_get() function with NULL parameters.
Test Plan: call elm_interface_scrollable_loop_get() function with NULL parameters.
Reviewers: Hermet, woohyun, kimcinoo, zmike
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9082
Summary:
https://phab.enlightenment.org/T7544
This is for set config values for gesture manager.
C# will use gesture manager instead of elm_gesture_layer.
Those config values should import to gesture manager to recognize and handle gestures.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi, stefan_schmidt, bu5hm4n, zmike, Jaehyun_Cho
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Subscribers: Jaehyun_Cho, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D7962
the problem that can be observed when clicking permanently on a view in
the view_manager_scroll. You will see things jump arround uncontrolled,
then when you quickly drag and drop, you will also see a lot of weird
moving arround artifacts. The reason for this is, that progress was not
correctly resetted, additionally, mouse_active also was not resetted
correctly in one case.
fix T7988
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9074
the problem here is, when we update content. We need to unset visibility
to the *old* content, and set visibility to the *new* content. This is
now finally fixed.
fix T8002
Reviewed-by: Jaehyun Cho <jae_hyun.cho@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9073
Summary:
when install is not set, meson take the value of install_dir. So when
this is removed, things will continue working correctly.
Reviewers: zmike, stefan_schmidt, cedric, segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: zmike
Subscribers: #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9065
Summary:
the data for this object may be further referenced during deletion
after this point without triggering errors, so ensure that pointers
which are accessible with api functions do not persist after deletion
@fix
Depends on D8985
Reviewers: cedric
Reviewed By: cedric
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D8986
Summary:
otherwise we say content is active that is not active anymore.
This fixes currently failing testcases.
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: segfaultxavi, cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9057
Summary:
The -1 here only worked for cases where we delete widgets at position 0.
When we are deleting something then we need to stay in the virtual
position where the view is right now, but *then* we need to animate
again into the direction where have real content. This commit ensures
that this is the case
fix T7989
Depends on D9056
Reviewers: segfaultxavi
Reviewed By: segfaultxavi
Subscribers: cedric, #reviewers, #committers
Tags: #efl
Maniphest Tasks: T7989
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D9055
Carsten Haitzler
Jaehyun Cho
Marcel Hollerbach
Xavi Artigas
Cedric BAIL
Mike Blumenkrantz
Hermet Park
WooHyun Jung
Jongmin Lee
Woochanlee
Taehyub Kim