elm_widget APIs are internal only, even if they may be EAPI. The EAPI
here is for modules.
I believe this API is only required for layout objects, so simply should
remain in the layout class. Then you can do efl_isa() and call the
functions or accept error messages if you want to be more careless.
Ref T5363
Summary:
"_cursors_count" static variable is not used when Elementary is built
for Wayland. It should be removed if els_cursor doesn't use it.
@fix
Test Plan: N/A
Reviewers: raster, zmike, ManMower
Tags: #efl
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5065
_elm_panel_efl_gfx_size_set() ends up calling
_elm_panel_elm_layout_sizing_eval() to adjust the layout
according to the updated width and height.
however, evas_object_geometr_get() doesn't return the updated values.
in fact, it is not necessary to call any API since the values are
stored as widget data in _elm_widget_efl_gfx_size_set().
Some names have not been changed, hopefully making a distinction
between legacy APIs and internal code (elm_layout_blah) and valid EO
usages.
This means many internal functions are still elm_layout_ as their
sole purpose is to support the legacy API.
Ref T5315
This makes elm_layout implement:
- efl_canvas_layout_signal_message_send
- efl_canvas_layout_signal_process
This only transfers the calls from the elm widget to the internal
edje object.
PS: message_send is quite ugly in C...
Ref T5315
@feature
elm_layout_sizing_eval() marks an object as requiring recalc.
Unfortunately, it's been massively abused by various widgets into
actually doing the calc, or the min calc. So we end up with one API
that has 3 different definitions depending on the widget type:
1. Mark as requiring recalc (correct, respects doc, elm_layout)
2. Calculate min size and other size hints
3. Actually do some geometry modification
I believe we need to clarify these 3 requirements into 3 very clear
and specific APIs in elementary. Right now we have similar functions
in evas for 1 (evas_object_smart_changed) and 3 (smart_calculate).
But their exact definition also isn't necessarily what we want for
elementary.
Another clear problem is that layout_eval does not do any calculation
(in theory), so the "eval" word is a bit of a stretch here.
Once we're sure about the exact API we want, we can add this back to
EO and make it work across our EO widgets. For now let's just keep
the legacy API, and its EO overrides, as is.
Ref T5315
forcing a full eval here is unnecessary and broken since such an eval could
either change geometry in unexpected ways or fail to accurately change
the underlying canvas geometry
@fix
This reverts commit 9368eedd35.
The release is out so we can revert this bandaid again. In the hope to
find the real culprit and solution before the next release.
Summary:
In _elm_layout_text_set function, text_signal_emit is called.
But in that case, check text whether it is null or not null before call signal_emit.
So "text" is not null always, and text_signal_emit's parameter "visible" is also always EINA_TRUE.
Reviewers: Jaehyun_Cho, cedric, jpeg
Reviewed By: Jaehyun_Cho
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5049
This merges them with the now standard interface:
Efl.Canvas.Layout_Signal
Some wrapping work was required for legacy API which
takes no user_data in del() but instead returns it. The
new EO function, while harder to use, is more correct
(you can't delete the invalid callback by accident, and
this follows EO events design).
Another crazy wrapping was done in entry/text in order
to add the callbacks to 2 objects instead of just one,
and still return the user data.
As for Naviframe and Popup, those two widgets override
signal_emit to forward the call to another object than
the resize object, but not callback_add/del. So they
are definitely broken.
Ref T5315
Here's the reasoning:
1. We will expose as many edje APIs as possible (and meaningful)
through the elm layout class.
2. Access to internal objects is usually risky, as it allows apps
to bypass EFL in some ways, leading to potentially undefined
behaviours.
3. If the need arises we can still add a similar API back to EO,
later.
Back to #1, it seems that the need for edje_get() was mostly to
call manual sizing functions, or the missing message_send(). I will
make sure these are accessible from the layout itself.
Ref T5315
This:
efl_content_set(efl_part(scroller, "default"), obj)
worked fine, but, this:
efl_content_set(scroller, obj)
didn't work as expected.
Thanks @JackDanielz for the report.
Note: There is a problem still... "default" should not work
with efl_part. This is quite bad, actually. It should
probably be "content" instead.
This makes layout parts implement Efl.Ui.Cursor.
This also adds the missing bool returns from that interface.
This removes 7 APIs from Elm.Layout.
Ref T5315
This is an API enabling accessibility on text(block) parts
in a layout. But it is said to have many issues. I can already
see that it only changes a flag but doesn't trigger any code
to create the appropriate objects, so definitely not fully
working.
According to @kimcinoo this may remain in legacy land for now.
Those APIs can then be used by Elm.Layout, hopefully
simplifying the API.
I wonder if the APIs should be prefixed "calc_" (as is)
or "layout_calc_". The extra "layout_" prefix would make
it common with other layout APIs (eg. signals, data,
size min/max, ...).
Ref T5315
Summary:
Implement efl_provider_find function for efl_ui_win class.
This will support to search window class by efl_provider_find function.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric, Jaehyun_Cho, thiepha, woohyun, Blackmole
Reviewed By: jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5045
This is really only a demonstration of what kind of information
we can print with efl_debug_name_get(). Hopefully this can help
debugging with printf/ERR logs and even help with live debugging
inside gdb.
This shouldn't be used for other purposes than debugging, as the
exact string format is not defined.
@feature
Currently, elementary programs crash on termination on macOS (seems
Sierra-specific). This is very nasty, looks like deep memory corruption...
Without valgrind (or like) support on Sierra, it is difficult to
pinpoint the origin of the problem.
Due to the imminient release, and after discussion with @stefan, this
kludge will allow the release to happen.
This commit MUST be reverted just after the release, so we don't
blindfold ourselves!
Ref T5245
This reverts commit 2d4d836018.
Don't pretend to fix an issue found by a static analyzer by
introducing another issue that even clang warns about.
Fixes:
elm_gesture_layer.c:2533: warning: using floating point absolute value
function 'fabs' when argument is of integer type [-Wabsolute-value]
if ((fabs(st->info.mx) > ELM_GESTURE_MINIMUM_MOMENTUM) ||
^
The elm_access a widget makes primitive object accessible. If a primitive
object is not visible, then the elm_access should NOT have state VISIBLE, and
SHOWING. From now the elm_access is checking visibility of primitive object.
this culd optentially use large offsets before accessing the ptr thus
it may not segv inthe first page but actually work if positionoffsets
are large enouh, so handle this case explicitly.
@fix
found by PVS studio
this culd optentially use large offsets before accessing the ptr thus
it may not segv inthe first page but actually work if positionoffsets
are large enouh, so handle this case explicitly.
@fix
found by PVS studio