calc_size_min was just a helper passing 0,0 to the restricted form.
Let's not duplicate APIs in EO and use an optional argument instead.
Bindings should be nicer and C could use a macro if it's too cumbersome
to pass in 0,0.
Those APIs can then be used by Elm.Layout, hopefully
simplifying the API.
I wonder if the APIs should be prefixed "calc_" (as is)
or "layout_calc_". The extra "layout_" prefix would make
it common with other layout APIs (eg. signals, data,
size min/max, ...).
Ref T5315
This is really only a demonstration of what kind of information
we can print with efl_debug_name_get(). Hopefully this can help
debugging with printf/ERR logs and even help with live debugging
inside gdb.
This shouldn't be used for other purposes than debugging, as the
exact string format is not defined.
@feature
This API is used by elementary widgets like:
edje_object_base_scale_get(elm_layout_edje_get(ly));
This means elm_layout in fact should also expose it directly.
Ref T5315
The following API is now supported with efl_part:
- Efl.Text.text { set; get; }
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor { get; }
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_paragraph_first;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_paragraph_last;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_position { set; get; }
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_coord_set;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_line_char_first;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_line_char_last;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_char_next;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_char_prev;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_line_jump_by;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_copy;
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_content { get; }
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_geometry { get; }
- Efl.Text.Cursor.cursor_text_insert;
Many of the 'part_text' functionality was moved to legacy, too.
See the edje_object.eo to see which ones are still supported.
You now use the following:
efl_text_set(efl_part(edje_obj, "part"), "text");
const char *text = efl_text_get(efl_part(edje_obj, "part"));
The former method of edje_object_part_text_set/get is now legacy.
Also, adjusted 'tests/emotion/emotion_test_main-eo.c' with
this change.
This introduces the new interface Efl.Ui.Base, intended to
share some APIs between Edje and Elm:
- mirrored (rtl)
- language
- scale
base_scale remains in Edje.Object for now. I don't think it
applies to generic widgets.
The new interface uses eo prefix "efl_ui". It could be renamed
as Efl.Ui (no Base), or anything else. As always, I'm open to
propositions!
Ref T5315
This changes a few method names:
- freeze -> calc_freeze
- thaw -> calc_thaw
- update_hints -> calc_update_hints
Otherwise this is mostly about reshuffling the EO file itself
and changing documentation.
Ref T5315
Still not happy with the name. I'm trying to avoid a name
clash between other "data" elements in the object. This is
the EDC group "data item".
Ref T5315
This moves all part_drag APIs to legacy and implements them for
EO using efl_part(). All parts now support these APIs, even if
they are not draggable. Making this more fine grained would
probably be much extra work for little gain.
This creates a new interface Efl.Ui.Drag.
This adds a new class: Efl.Canvas.Layout.External.
I hate this long name...
This class represents an external part, and for now only
supports param_set/get as well as param_type_get. For now
param_type_get() still returns an Edje_External_Param_Type and
not another more generic type.
TODO: enumerate choices, return object, return content
Original patch by Jinwoo Shin:
If edje has multiple levels of child group,
edje_object_message_signal_process cannot process message on
child group. To cover that, it needs to add new API which
traverses its hierarchy and process messages.
@feature
Signed-off-by: jinwoo.shin <jw0227.shin@samsung.com>
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4914
This refactors even more the edje part eo internals. But now
common part APIs can easily be implemented in edje_part.c
The API now looks like:
efl_gfx_geometry_get(efl_part(edje, "part"), &x, &y, &w, &h)
Ooooh. This one might be controversial, as some apps definitely
use the function. But it is so easily abused. For our EO API
we are trying to not expose any internal object, as this prevents
us from making changes to the internal behaviour and structure.
All the features that this API provided should be limited to
read-only access to the internal object. In order to replace
this, we will have to return an Efl.Part object that implements
all those APIs: geometry_get, visibility_get, etc...
Most of the values were the same, with edje having just a couple
more error codes.
Not entirely sure the prefix Efl.Image is correct for this type.
Maybe just Efl.Load.Error?
Since this uses generic_value (aka Eina_Value), there is an
implicit type detection and conversion. I did not attempt to
cover all types (namely string+int and string+float and even
less sets of those) as I believe they aren't really used. Or
they most likely could be replaced by multiple messages rather
than a single message.
Note: should we pass ptr(generic_value) instead of generic_value?
The API looks a little odd in C when passing by value.
@feature
It is used to receive messages with a payload from embryo to C.
This API has a function pointer, which means it would have to be
manually bound, or transformed (eg. eo event).
Also, prepare the change for message_send to use Eina_Value and
no explicit type.
This feature seems rarely used.
But note that handler_set is in fact used in terminology, rage and
luncher. So, if the need arises, it will have to be transformed in
a proper EO way.
This may be a bit more controversial...
But Evas_Coord really is just an int and all the internals
of EFL assume that the base coordinate type is a 32-bit int.
So this type is a bit redondant and can't easily be changed
to, say, a float or int64.
Ref T5312
Summary: I had fixed some typos and wrong expressions, euch as capital letters, singular Etc. in Ecore and Edje API reference doxygen.
Test Plan: Doxygen Revision
Reviewers: stefan, cedric, raster, Jaehyun_Cho, jpeg
Subscribers: conr2d
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D4677
The getter of part_external_type should return this enum value
on error. Thanks Artem Popov for original fix, which however
involved using an integer value directly instead of the less
error-prone enum (see D4502).
This is an override of efl_gfx_size_set. Same as before, the
order of operations matter so it is possible that a corner
case will break. In particular, legacy code was:
- intercept
- smart resize (do stuff), super, super, super
- evas object resize
The new code is more like:
- intercept
- super, super, super, evas object resize
- do stuff
But unfortunately this broke elm_widget (read: all widgets) as
the internal resize was done before the object resize. So,
inside the resize event cb, the resize_obj size would not match
the smart object size. >_<
This is an override of efl_gfx_position_set.
As for the other patches, I hope I didn't break anything.
A problem likely to happen is that the super call was inserted
too early or too late in the call flow. For instance:
_myclass_position_set(obj, x, y) {
position_set(super(obj), x, y);
position_get(obj, &prevx, &prevy);
do_something_with_delta_xy();
}
The above code flow is obvisouly wrong, but may have crept in this
patch (such a bug sneaked in inside smart object, breaking
everything at first).
These should be just overrides of Efl.Gfx.visible.set. Many
widgets were handling smart show() and hide() manually, which
means this patch is quite large.
Hopefully this doesn't break anything, obviously. But here are
some widgets known to be problematic, as the old code flow was
really strange (sometimes not calling the efl_super function):
- window
- notify
Most of the smart functions "Efl.Canvas.Group.group_xxx" should
not exist and be overrides of the base object function instead.
Cleaning this up is necessary if we want an EO API for custom
smart objects. This patch is the first attempt at removing a
method (the simplest one).
As for no_render, I wonder if propagating to the children
really is necessary. evas_render should skip them already.
- convert methods to property setter/getter
- remove "values" block when getter returns read_only value
- fit the type of params of eo funcs to those of legacy APIs
Daniel Hirt
Jean-Philippe Andre
Daniel Kolesa
Amitesh Singh
Jihoon Kim
Myoungwoon Roy, Kim
Bruno Dilly
Stefan Schmidt
Jee-Yong Um
Jee-Yong Um