Summary:
dev branch : devs/subhransu/font
The Final goal is to move the evas_font module to ector so that both ector and evas can reuse the code.
make the api simple so that sam eapi can be used by evas_textblock and ector text.
This is the 1st stage to achive that gola, first remove the evas internal dependancy as much as possible before moving to ector library.
Reviewers: jpeg, raster, herdsman, cedric, id213sin
Subscribers: cedric, jpeg
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5419
Summary:
If object just has update of map point without other changes included child,
the map surface can be reused.
Reviewers: jpeg, cedric
Differential Revision: https://phab.enlightenment.org/D5181
This is a semi experimental patch to set the default weight
of objects to (1, 1), i.e. EXPAND. This seems like a more
sensible default value than no weight. Some objects may not
need the expand weight, but this seems to be the minority,
not the majority.
Ref T5301
Objects show should happen as early as possible during the render cycle,
as it affects smart objects calculation and everything else.
Thanks @JackDanielZ for the report!
Fixes T5880
All legacy objects remain invisible by default. Any call to
visible_set() will prevent the automatic show() to happen.
show() will be done just before render time, which may be a
bit too late in order to propagate the necessary changes.
This may break some things where some objects are created
internally using efl_add() instead of the legacy API, and
the intent was not to show the object.
@feature
Some objects don't go through render_pre (unchanged, child
of mapped parents), even though they will go through
evas_render_mapped. Those were marked as pre_render_done
inside evas_render_mapped since it seemed to fix some issues
a long time ago.
Unfortunately, if those objects are changed their flag may
not be reset to false, which means they never go through
render_pre, leading to render issues.
I believe simply restoring the value of the pre_render_done
flag should be good enough. I don't know why it is set to
true inside evas_render_mapped but I also don't want to find
out :)
See 9ac13e4aec (old)
See 87e5e70a9d (older)
Patch made with @jiin.moon
This is a very simple proof of concept for using hardware planes for
evas image objects.
Right now only dmabuf objects will be dropped into planes, and they're
considered in the order they're in in the scene graph with no attention
paid to which objects will have the most benefit from being on a plane
at all. There's nothing to prevent your mouse cursor from consuming the
only hardware plane capable of UHD video. :)
This is mostly just to help test the low level functionality in the
engines and ecore_drm2 that enable hardware planes. Smarter plane usage
is coming.
This implements an entirely new API model for Evas Map by relying
on high-level transformations on the object rather than an external
Evas_Map structure that needs to be constantly updated manually.
The implementation relies on Evas_Map.
To rotate an object all you need to do now is
efl_gfx_map_rotate(obj, 45.0, NULL, 0.5, 0.5);
Or with a C++ syntax:
obj.rotate(45.0, NULL, 0.5, 0.5);
Or even simply (with default arguments):
obj.rotate(45.0);
The map transformation functions are:
- rotate
- rotate_3d
- rotate_quat
- zoom
- translate (new!)
- perspective_3d
- lightning_3d
@feature
Test case:
elementary_test -to "Gesture Layer"
Just move the pictures around (eg. to the bottom). They could
disappear entirely.
This is because the geometry used was based on the smart
object "bounding box" rather than the mapped output.
@fix
This is the first step toward handling multi output. This patch
remove engine.data.output from Evas structure and use an Eina_List
for it instead. It also start moving code around to fetch an output
or an engine context (which are the same at the moment, but will be
split in a later patch).
This improves over the previous code for handling
snapshot objects and cutouts. Basically any opaque object
above a snapshot should be obscuring it. That is true
unless a crazy filter is applied, or the snapshot object
is itself the source of a map or proxy.
This also uses eina_tiler instead of a custom (and really
bad) algorithm to compute the obscure regions.
This make save() work on snapshot objects, provided the call
is done from inside render_post.
Also, this saves the filtered output of an image, rather than
its source pixels. Any call to save() on a filtered image must
be done from post-render as well.
Fixes T2102
@feature
The situation is clearly visible in the Snapshot test case:
increase the radius and a red glow would appear. This is because
the snapshot object was not marked as needing redraw and so had
no pixels under the opaque rectangle.
When using a snapshot object we have access to exactly all
the pixels below it inside the snapshot surface. So, in order
to produce a nice blur, it is necessary to expand this snapshot
and then clip it otherwise the edges will look a bit ugly.
Unfortunately, there are still places where blurs didn't look
so good, as objects below an opaque region would never get
rendered into the snapshot object. So the edges, inside a
snapshot object, around an opaque region would have blur
artifacts.
This fixes that by shrinking the cutout regions by the radius
of the filter. Eg for blur this is the blur radius.
The test case in elm_test can exhibit this fix very clearly:
a red glow would be visible around the opaque rectangle, but with
these changes we instead see the blurry edges of the objects
below the rectangle.
This will be most useful in a special case, where a filter is
used in a window decoration, applied to a snapshot object.
Another optimization that might be wanted is passing a list
of update regions (from the proxy or snapshot).
The filters don't support the obscuring region yet, only some
of the high-level logic is implemented.
Cedric Bail
Jean-Philippe Andre
subhransu mohanty
jiin.moon
Carsten Haitzler
Derek Foreman
Mike Blumenkrantz